- android.gs
- Compare
- Pova Slim vs Spark 40 Pro
Tecno Pova Slim vs Tecno Spark 40 Pro
What Pova Slim does better (6) and where Spark 40 Pro wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.8Display9.8
5.0Performance4.5
5.2Camera5.2
7.8Battery7.9
6.2Features5.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Pova SlimSpark 40 Pro
| Pova Slim | Spark 40 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.2 mm | 163.7 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 75.9 mm | = |
| Thickness | 6 mm | 6.7 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Weight | 156 g | 170 g | −14 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Pova Slim better than Spark 40 Pro?
- 5GYes · Spark 40 Pro: No
- AnTuTu score613,165 vs 584,885+5%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+14%
- Weight156 g vs 170 g+9%
- Thickness6 mm vs 6.7 mm+12%
Why is Spark 40 Pro better than Pova Slim?
- Stereo speakersNo · Pova Slim: Yes
- Memory card slotNo · Pova Slim: Yes
- Dual SIMNo · Pova Slim: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Pova Slim: Yes
- Charged in 30 min53% vs 62%+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 156 g | 170 g |
| Thickness | 6 mm | 6.7 mm |
| Height | 164.2 mm | 163.7 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 75.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Sky Blue, Slim White, Cool Black | Ink Black, Moon Titanium, Lake Blue, Bamboo Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,224 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,720 px | 2,720 px |
| Pixel density | 440 ppi | 440 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,578 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.1% | 89.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6400 | Mediatek Helio G100 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 613,165 | 584,885 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,988 | 1,979 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.8" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,160 mAh | 5,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 53% | 62% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 15 | HIOS 15.1 |
