- android.gs
- Compare
- Pova 7 4G vs Armor X16 Pro
Tecno Pova 7 4G vs UleFone Armor X16 Pro
What Pova 7 4G does better (11) and where Armor X16 Pro wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.0Display5.8
5.6Camera6.1
8.8Battery8.6
4.6Features7.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Pova 7 4GArmor X16 Pro
| Pova 7 4G | Armor X16 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 168.6 mm | 173.8 mm | −5.2 mm |
| Width | 76.6 mm | 83.4 mm | −6.8 mm |
| Thickness | 9.3 mm | 18 mm | −8.7 mm |
| Weight | 203 g | 395 g | −192 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Pova 7 4G better than Armor X16 Pro?
- Main camera108 MP vs 64 MP+69%
- OLED panelYes · Armor X16 Pro: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Armor X16 Pro: No
- Weight203 g vs 395 g+95%
- Wired charging45 W vs 33 W+36%
- Pixel density396 ppi vs 269 ppi+47%
- Thickness9.3 mm vs 18 mm+94%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.6″+3%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
- Screen-to-body ratio84.5% vs 71.3%+19%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is Armor X16 Pro better than Pova 7 4G?
- Battery capacity7,000 mAh vs 10,360 mAh+48%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- 5GNo · Pova 7 4G: Yes
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 16 MP2×
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 5+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 203 g | 395 g |
| Thickness | 9.3 mm | 18 mm |
| Height | 168.6 mm | 173.8 mm |
| Width | 76.6 mm | 83.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Hyper Titanium, Magic Silver, Geek Black | Wasteland Shadow/Sand Dune |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 1,612 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 910 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.5% | 71.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G100 Ultimate | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 573,915 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,014 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.73" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,000 mAh | 10,360 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 52% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 15 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | A |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 115 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
