- android.gs
- Compare
- Pova 4 Pro vs Blade V40 Pro
Tecno Pova 4 Pro vs ZTE Blade V40 Pro
What Pova 4 Pro does better (9) and where Blade V40 Pro wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.3Display6.5
4.6Camera6.1
8.2Battery7.9
5.6Features2.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Pova 4 ProBlade V40 Pro
| Pova 4 Pro | Blade V40 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.8 mm | 163.9 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 76.2 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Thickness | 9.2 mm | 8.3 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Weight | 211 g | 190 g | +21 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Pova 4 Pro better than Blade V40 Pro?
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- NFCYes · Blade V40 Pro: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Blade V40 Pro: No
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,100 mAh+18%
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz+10%
Why is Blade V40 Pro better than Pova 4 Pro?
- Wired charging45 W vs 65 W+44%
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Weight211 g vs 190 g+11%
- Charged in 30 min62% vs 100%+61%
- Thickness9.2 mm vs 8.3 mm+11%
- Screen-to-body ratio83% vs 86%+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 211 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 9.2 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 164.8 mm | 163.9 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 76.2 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | — |
| Colours | Fluorite Blue | Dark Green, Iridescent White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 403 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83% | 86% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Unisoc Tiger T618 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali G52 MP2 |
| AnTuTu score | 556,518 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,047 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 346 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 5,100 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 65 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 62% | 100% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | — |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HiOS 8.6 | MyOS 11 |
