- android.gs
- Compare
- Pova 4 Pro vs Redmi Note 11 SE (India)
Tecno Pova 4 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 SE (India)
What Pova 4 Pro does better (10) and where Redmi Note 11 SE (India) wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.3Display6.5
4.6Camera7.0
8.2Battery6.0
5.6Features4.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Pova 4 ProRedmi Note 11 SE (India)
| Pova 4 Pro | Redmi Note 11 SE (India) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.8 mm | 160.5 mm | +4.3 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 74.5 mm | +2.5 mm |
| Thickness | 9.2 mm | 8.3 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Weight | 211 g | 179 g | +32 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Pova 4 Pro better than Redmi Note 11 SE (India)?
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+20%
- Wired charging45 W vs 33 W+36%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 64 GB4×
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.05 GHz+7%
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.4″+4%
- Charged in 30 min62% vs 54%+15%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is Redmi Note 11 SE (India) better than Pova 4 Pro?
- Peak brightness450 nits vs 1,100 nits2.4×
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Memory card slotNo · Pova 4 Pro: Yes
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Pova 4 Pro: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Weight211 g vs 179 g+18%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 13 MP+62%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 5+25%
- Thickness9.2 mm vs 8.3 mm+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 211 g | 179 g |
| Thickness | 9.2 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 164.8 mm | 160.5 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 74.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Fluorite Blue | Thunder Purple, Cosmic White, Shadow Black, Bifrost Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 403 ppi | 409 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | 1,100 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83% | 83.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.05 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| AnTuTu score | 556,518 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,047 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 346 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.97" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 62% | 54% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HiOS 8.6 | MIUI 12.5 |
