- android.gs
- Compare
- Pova 4 Pro vs X80 Lite
Tecno Pova 4 Pro vs Vivo X80 Lite
What Pova 4 Pro does better (6) and where X80 Lite wins (16) — every spec side by side.
6.3Display7.3
4.4Performance4.1
4.6Camera8.8
8.2Battery4.8
5.6Features6.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Pova 4 ProX80 Lite
| Pova 4 Pro | X80 Lite | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.8 mm | 159.2 mm | +5.6 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 74.2 mm | +2.8 mm |
| Thickness | 9.2 mm | 7.8 mm | +1.4 mm |
| Weight | 211 g | 186 g | +25 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Pova 4 Pro better than X80 Lite?
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+33%
- AnTuTu score556,518 vs 461,428+21%
- Stereo speakersYes · X80 Lite: No
- Wired charging45 W vs 44 W+2%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · X80 Lite: No
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.4″+3%
Why is X80 Lite better than Pova 4 Pro?
- Peak brightness450 nits vs 1,300 nits2.9×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Pova 4 Pro: Yes
- 5GNo · Pova 4 Pro: Yes
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 50 MP6.2×
- Memory card slotNo · Pova 4 Pro: Yes
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Pova 4 Pro: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- 4K selfie videoNo · Pova 4 Pro: Yes
- Weight211 g vs 186 g+13%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 211 g | 186 g |
| Thickness | 9.2 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 164.8 mm | 159.2 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 74.2 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | — |
| Colours | Fluorite Blue | Diamond Black, Sunrise Gold |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 2,404 px |
| Pixel density | 403 ppi | 409 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 781 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83% | 84.7% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Mediatek Dimensity 900 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| AnTuTu score | 556,518 | 461,428 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,047 | 2,023 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 346 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 62% | 61% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -28.3 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HiOS 8.6 | Funtouch 12 |
