- android.gs
- Compare
- Phantom V Fold2 vs nubia Flip
Tecno Phantom V Fold2 vs ZTE nubia Flip
What Phantom V Fold2 does better (16) and where nubia Flip wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.3Display8.0
5.8Camera3.2
7.0Battery3.8
3.2Features6.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Phantom V Fold2nubia Flip
| Phantom V Fold2 | nubia Flip | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159 mm | 170 mm | −11 mm |
| Width | 140.4 mm | 75.5 mm | +64.9 mm |
| Thickness | 6.1 mm | 7 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Weight | 249 g | 214 g | +35 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Phantom V Fold2 better than nubia Flip?
- Wired charging70 W vs 33 W2.1×
- Battery capacity5,750 mAh vs 4,310 mAh+33%
- Optical stabilisationYes · nubia Flip: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · nubia Flip: No
- Wireless chargingYes · nubia Flip: No
- Storage (base)512 GB vs 128 GB4×
- Rear cameras3 vs 13×
- CPU frequency3.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+33%
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · nubia Flip: No
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Screen size7.8″ vs 6.9″+14%
- Resolution (width)2,000 px vs 1,188 px+68%
Why is nubia Flip better than Phantom V Fold2?
- eSIMNo · Phantom V Fold2: Yes
- Weight249 g vs 214 g+16%
- Pixel density388 ppi vs 439 ppi+13%
- Charged in 30 min75% vs 83%+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 249 g | 214 g |
| Thickness | 6.1 mm | 7 mm |
| Height | 159 mm | 170 mm |
| Width | 140.4 mm | 75.5 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Colours | Karst Green, Rippling Blue | Sunshine Gold, Cosmic Black, Flowering Lilac |
| Stylus | Yes | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 7.8″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | Foldable OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 2,000 px | 1,188 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,296 px | 2,790 px |
| Pixel density | 388 ppi | 439 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Measured brightness | 573 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.2% | 86.3% |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9000+ | Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G710 MC10 | Adreno 644 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,158,040 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 4,327 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,559 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 512 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.3" | — |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,750 mAh | 4,310 mAh |
| Active use (test) | 9.6 h | — |
| Wired charging | 70 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 75% | 83% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -27.1 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HiOS 14 Fold | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 2 | — |
