- android.gs
- Compare
- Camon 50 Pro vs Camon 50 Ultra
Tecno Camon 50 Pro vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
What Camon 50 Pro does better (4) and where Camon 50 Ultra wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.7Display9.5
7.2Performance6.7
9.1Camera9.1
8.5Battery8.5
7.4Features8.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Camon 50 ProCamon 50 Ultra
| Camon 50 Pro | Camon 50 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.4 mm | 162.4 mm | = |
| Width | 77 mm | 77 mm | = |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 7.8 mm | = |
| Weight | 175 g | 178 g | −3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Camon 50 Pro better than Camon 50 Ultra?
- AnTuTu score1,059,715 vs 804,875+32%
- Battery capacity6,500 mAh vs 6,160 mAh+6%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,199 vs 3,134+2%
- Memory card slotYes · Camon 50 Ultra: No
Why is Camon 50 Ultra better than Camon 50 Pro?
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- 4K selfie videoNo · Camon 50 Pro: Yes
- eSIMNo · Camon 50 Pro: Yes
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 6+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 175 g | 178 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 162.4 mm | 162.4 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 77 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Moonshadow Black, Cypress Green, Nebula Titanium, Misty Purple | Moonshadow Black, Cypress Green, Nebula Titanium, Luminous Orange, Misty Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,208 px | 1,208 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,644 px | 2,644 px |
| Pixel density | 429 ppi | 429 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,302 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.6% | 89.6% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,059,715 | 804,875 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,199 | 3,134 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,050 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3× | 3× |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,500 mAh | 6,160 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 16 h |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 42% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.4 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 16 | HIOS 16 |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | 3 |
