- android.gs
- Compare
- Camon 30 vs Y200 (Asia)
Tecno Camon 30 vs Vivo Y200 (Asia)
What Camon 30 does better (5) and where Y200 (Asia) wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.6Display8.4
7.8Camera6.8
7.3Battery7.4
4.2Features5.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Camon 30Y200 (Asia)
| Camon 30 | Y200 (Asia) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165.3 mm | 163.2 mm | +2.1 mm |
| Width | 75.3 mm | 75.9 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 7.8 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 198 g | 188 g | +10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Camon 30 better than Y200 (Asia)?
- Optical stabilisationYes · Y200 (Asia): No
- NFCYes · Y200 (Asia): No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Y200 (Asia): No
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5+6%
Why is Y200 (Asia) better than Camon 30?
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- 5GNo · Camon 30: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Camon 30: Yes
- Wired charging70 W vs 80 W+14%
- Storage (base)8 GB vs 256 GB32×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Camon 30: Yes
- Weight198 g vs 188 g+5%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Charged in 30 min67% vs 80%+19%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 198 g | 188 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 165.3 mm | 163.2 mm |
| Width | 75.3 mm | 75.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Colours | Iceland Basaltic Dark, Uyuni Salt White, Sahara Sand Brown | Dynamic Black (Imperial Black), Titanium Silver, Dreamy Violet |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,436 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.3% | 86.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 Ultimate | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 613 |
| AnTuTu score | 591,209 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,976 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 8 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.57" | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 70 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 67% | 80% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 16 | Funtouch 14 |
| Major OS updates promised | 2 | — |
