android.gs
Compare
Galaxy A35 vs Camon 30

Samsung Galaxy A35 vs Tecno Camon 30

What Galaxy A35 does better (14) and where Camon 30 wins (9) — every spec side by side.

Samsung · 2024Galaxy A35

7.7Score

14 advantages≈ $195

Higher score

Tecno · 2024Camon 30

7.6Score

9 advantages

7.4Display8.6

5.2Performance5.0

8.0Camera7.8

4.2Battery7.3

8.5Features4.2

Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy A35Camon 30

	Galaxy A35	Camon 30	Difference
Height	161.7 mm	165.3 mm	−3.6 mm
Width	78 mm	75.3 mm	+2.7 mm
Thickness	8.2 mm	7.7 mm	+0.5 mm
Weight	209 g	198 g	+12 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy A35 better than Camon 30?

5GYes · Camon 30: No
Stereo speakersYes · Camon 30: No
Major OS updates promised4 vs 22×
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,740 vs 1,976+39%
Storage (base)128 GB vs 8 GB16×
Rear cameras2 vs 12×
Ultra-wide cameraYes · Camon 30: No
Max video4K vs 1080p
4K selfie videoYes · Camon 30: No
eSIMYes · Camon 30: No
CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
Process5 nm vs 6 nm+20%

Why is Camon 30 better than Galaxy A35?

Wired charging25 W vs 70 W2.8×
AnTuTu score522,829 vs 591,209+13%
Selfie camera13 MP vs 50 MP3.8×
3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Galaxy A35: Yes
Weight209 g vs 198 g+6%
Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+3%
Charged in 30 min52% vs 67%+29%
Thickness8.2 mm vs 7.7 mm+6%
Screen-to-body ratio84.8% vs 88.3%+4%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Samsung Galaxy A35≈ $1957.7	Tecno Camon 307.6
Design
Weight	209 g	198 g
Thickness	8.2 mm	7.7 mm
Height	161.7 mm	165.3 mm
Width	78 mm	75.3 mm
Frame	Plastic	Plastic
Back	Glass	Glass
Ingress protection	IP67	—
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx7	—
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+	—
Colours	Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon	Iceland Basaltic Dark, Uyuni Salt White, Sahara Sand Brown
Display
Screen size	6.6″	6.8″
Panel	Super AMOLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,340 px	2,436 px
Pixel density	390 ppi	393 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	1,000 nits	—
Measured brightness	1,024 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	84.8%	88.3%
HDR	Yes	—
Performance
Chipset	Exynos 1380	Mediatek Helio G99 Ultimate
Chip maker	Exynos	MediaTek
Process	5 nm	6 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.4 GHz	2.2 GHz
GPU	Mali-G68 MP5	Mali-G57 MC2
AnTuTu score	522,829	591,209
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	2,740	1,976
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	806	—
Memory
RAM	12 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	8 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	UFS 2.2
Memory card slot	Yes	Yes
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.9
Main sensor size	1/1.96"	1/1.57"
Rear cameras	2	1
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	No
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	4K	1080p
4K video frame rate	30 fps	—
Selfie camera	13 MP	50 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	No
Battery
Battery capacity	5,000 mAh	5,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Ion	Li-Po
Active use (test)	12.4 h	—
Wired charging	25 W	70 W
Charged in 30 min	52%	67%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	Yes	No
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth	5.3	5.3
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Infrared port	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	No
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	-26.1 LUFS	—
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)	0.44 W/kg	—
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 14
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	One UI 7	HIOS 16
Major OS updates promised	4	2