- android.gs
- Compare
- Camon 30 vs iQOO Z9x
Tecno Camon 30 vs Vivo iQOO Z9x
What Camon 30 does better (8) and where iQOO Z9x wins (9) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Camon 30iQOO Z9x
| Camon 30 | iQOO Z9x | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165.3 mm | 165.7 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Width | 75.3 mm | 76 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 198 g | 199 g | −2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Camon 30 better than iQOO Z9x?
- Wired charging70 W vs 44 W+59%
- OLED panelYes · iQOO Z9x: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · iQOO Z9x: No
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 8 MP6.2×
- Charged in 30 min67% vs 58%+16%
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5.1+4%
- Thickness7.7 mm vs 8 mm+4%
- Screen-to-body ratio88.3% vs 86.4%+2%
Why is iQOO Z9x better than Camon 30?
- AnTuTu score591,209 vs 729,289+23%
- 5GNo · Camon 30: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Camon 30: Yes
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,976 vs 2,836+44%
- Storage (base)8 GB vs 128 GB16×
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 198 g | 199 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 165.3 mm | 165.7 mm |
| Width | 75.3 mm | 76 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Colours | Iceland Basaltic Dark, Uyuni Salt White, Sahara Sand Brown | Tornado Green (Northern Green), Storm Grey (Mystic Black), White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,436 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.3% | 86.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 Ultimate | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 710 |
| AnTuTu score | 591,209 | 729,289 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,976 | 2,836 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 8 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.57" | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 70 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 67% | 58% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 16 | Funtouch OS 14 (International) |
| Major OS updates promised | 2 | — |
