- android.gs
- Compare
- Camon 30 vs Armor Mini 20 Pro
Tecno Camon 30 vs UleFone Armor Mini 20 Pro
What Camon 30 does better (13) and where Armor Mini 20 Pro wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.6Display4.2
7.8Camera5.9
7.3Battery8.2
4.2Features7.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Camon 30Armor Mini 20 Pro
| Camon 30 | Armor Mini 20 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165.3 mm | 133.5 mm | +31.8 mm |
| Width | 75.3 mm | 63.3 mm | +12 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 24.9 mm | −17.2 mm |
| Weight | 198 g | 301 g | −104 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Camon 30 better than Armor Mini 20 Pro?
- Wired charging70 W vs 33 W2.1×
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- OLED panelYes · Armor Mini 20 Pro: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Armor Mini 20 Pro: No
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- Weight198 g vs 301 g+52%
- Thickness7.7 mm vs 24.9 mm3.2×
- Screen size6.8″ vs 4.7″+44%
- Pixel density393 ppi vs 373 ppi+5%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
- Screen-to-body ratio88.3% vs 63.1%+40%
Why is Armor Mini 20 Pro better than Camon 30?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,200 mAh+24%
- Wireless chargingNo · Camon 30: Yes
- 5GNo · Camon 30: Yes
- Storage (base)8 GB vs 256 GB32×
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 198 g | 301 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 24.9 mm |
| Height | 165.3 mm | 133.5 mm |
| Width | 75.3 mm | 63.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Colours | Iceland Basaltic Dark, Uyuni Salt White, Sahara Sand Brown | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 4.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,436 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 373 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.3% | 63.1% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 Ultimate | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 591,209 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,976 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 8 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/2 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.57" | 1/1.31" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 70 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 67% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 15 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Yes |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 16 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 2 | — |
