How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Camon 20 vs Blade A54

Tecno Camon 20 vs ZTE Blade A54

What Camon 20 does better (12) and where Blade A54 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Tecno Camon 20
Tecno · 2023Camon 20
5.3Score
12 advantages
vs
ZTE Blade A54
ZTE · 2023Blade A54
5.6Score
4 advantages≈ $95
Higher score
5.6Display4.8
6.4Camera2.5
3.1Features6.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Camon 20Blade A54
76.7 × 163.47.875.8 × 1648.5
Camon 20Blade A54Difference
Height163.4 mm164 mm−0.6 mm
Width76.7 mm75.8 mm+0.9 mm
Thickness7.8 mm8.5 mm−0.7 mm
Weight190 g185 g+5 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Camon 20 better than Blade A54?

  1. Main camera64 MP vs 13 MP4.9×
  2. RAM8 GB vs 4 GB2×
  3. OLED panelYes · Blade A54: No
  4. Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
  5. Stereo speakersYes · Blade A54: No
  6. Pixel density395 ppi vs 267 ppi+48%
  7. Storage (base)256 GB vs 64 GB4×
  8. Selfie camera32 MP vs 2 MP16×
  9. Process12 nm vs 28 nm2.3×
  10. CPU frequency2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz+25%
  11. Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
  12. Thickness7.8 mm vs 8.5 mm+9%

Why is Blade A54 better than Camon 20?

  1. Refresh rate60 Hz vs 90 Hz+50%
  2. NFCNo · Camon 20: Yes
  3. Weight190 g vs 185 g+3%
  4. Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 5+25%
Specifications

Side by side

ZTE Blade A54ZTE Blade A54≈ $955.6
Design
Weight190 g185 g
Thickness7.8 mm8.5 mm
Height163.4 mm164 mm
Width76.7 mm75.8 mm
FramePlastic—
BackPlastic—
Ingress protectionIP53—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx3—
ColoursPredawn Black, Glacier Glow, Serenity BlueGray, Blue, Lilac
Display
Screen size6.7″6.6″
PanelAMOLEDIPS LCD
OLED panelYesNo
Resolution (width)1,080 px720 px
Resolution (height)2,400 px1,612 px
Pixel density395 ppi267 ppi
Refresh rate60 Hz90 Hz
Peak brightness500 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio85.7%84.2%
Performance
ChipsetMediatek MT6769Z Helio G85Unisoc SC9863A
Chip makerMediaTekUnisoc
Process12 nm28 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2 GHz1.6 GHz
GPUMali-G52 MC2IMG8322
AnTuTu score346,842—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,360—
Memory
RAM8 GB4 GB
Storage (max)256 GB128 GB
Storage (base)256 GB64 GB
Storage typeUFS 2.1—
Memory card slotYesYes
Camera
Main camera64 MP13 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.7—
Main sensor size1/1.7"—
Rear cameras11
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Ultra-wide cameraNoNo
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Max video1080p1080p
Selfie camera32 MP2 MP
4K selfie videoNoNo
Battery
Battery capacity5,000 mAh5,000 mAh
Battery typeLi-Po—
Wired charging33 W—
Charged in 30 min38%—
Wireless chargingNo—
Connectivity
5GNo—
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.25.2
NFCNoYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS—
Features
Stereo speakersYesNo
3.5 mm headphone jackYesYes
Fingerprint sensorUnder displaySide
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer
Software
OS at launchAndroid 13Android 13
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceHIOS 14—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare