- android.gs
- Compare
- Camon 20 vs Redmi 13C 5G
Tecno Camon 20 vs Xiaomi Redmi 13C 5G
What Camon 20 does better (13) and where Redmi 13C 5G wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.6Display4.9
2.8Performance4.2
6.4Camera4.1
6.0Battery4.6
3.1Features5.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Camon 20Redmi 13C 5G
| Camon 20 | Redmi 13C 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.4 mm | 168.1 mm | −4.7 mm |
| Width | 76.7 mm | 77.9 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.2 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Weight | 190 g | 192 g | −2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Camon 20 better than Redmi 13C 5G?
- Wired charging33 W vs 18 W+83%
- OLED panelYes · Redmi 13C 5G: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Redmi 13C 5G: No
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- Pixel density395 ppi vs 260 ppi+52%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx3 vs IPx2+50%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 64 GB4×
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 5 MP6.4×
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
- Charged in 30 min38% vs 28%+36%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 8.2 mm+5%
Why is Redmi 13C 5G better than Camon 20?
- AnTuTu score346,842 vs 546,817+58%
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 90 Hz+50%
- 5GNo · Camon 20: Yes
- NFCNo · Camon 20: Yes
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,360 vs 1,943+43%
- Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
- Peak brightness500 nits vs 600 nits+20%
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+10%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 5+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | 192 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 163.4 mm | 168.1 mm |
| Width | 76.7 mm | 77.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | IP52 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | IPx2 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Predawn Black, Glacier Glow, Serenity Blue | Starry Black, Twilight Blue, Starry Silver, Starlight Black, Startrail Green, Startrail Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 600 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.7% | 83.8% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 346,842 | 546,817 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,360 | 1,943 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 38% | 28% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.98 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 14 | HyperOS 2 |
