- android.gs
- Compare
- Camon 19 Pro vs Y72t
Tecno Camon 19 Pro vs Vivo Y72t
What Camon 19 Pro does better (12) and where Y72t wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.1Display4.6
8.2Camera4.6
6.0Battery7.0
4.3Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Camon 19 ProY72t
| Camon 19 Pro | Y72t | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.8 mm | 163.9 mm | +2.9 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 75.3 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 9.2 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Weight | 204 g | 200 g | +4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Camon 19 Pro better than Y72t?
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- Wired charging33 W vs 18 W+83%
- Optical stabilisationYes · Y72t: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · Y72t: No
- NFCYes · Y72t: No
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 8 MP4×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.6″+3%
- Main camera aperturef/1.6 vs f/1.8+12%
- Thickness8.6 mm vs 9.2 mm+7%
- Screen-to-body ratio88.2% vs 84.5%+4%
Why is Y72t better than Camon 19 Pro?
- 5GNo · Camon 19 Pro: Yes
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
- CPU frequency2.05 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+7%
- Process12 nm vs 7 nm+71%
- Weight204 g vs 200 g+2%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 5+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 204 g | 200 g |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 9.2 mm |
| Height | 166.8 mm | 163.9 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 75.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colours | Polar Blue, Eco Black, Mondrian | Black, Blue, Pink |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 401 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 480 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 479 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.2% | 84.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 | Mediatek Dimensity 700 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.05 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 348,546 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,734 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 326 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.7" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 2.1× | — |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 47% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.7 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 13 | OriginOS 11 |
