- android.gs
- Compare
- Note 12 (2023) vs Camon 19 Pro
Infinix Note 12 (2023) vs Tecno Camon 19 Pro
What Note 12 (2023) does better (13) and where Camon 19 Pro wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.6Display6.1
4.1Performance3.2
5.5Camera8.2
6.0Battery6.0
5.0Features4.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Note 12 (2023)Camon 19 Pro
| Note 12 (2023) | Camon 19 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.4 mm | 166.8 mm | −2.4 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 74.6 mm | +1.9 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.6 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Weight | 195 g | 204 g | −9 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Note 12 (2023) better than Camon 19 Pro?
- AnTuTu score550,994 vs 348,546+58%
- Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 480 nits2.1×
- OLED panelYes · Camon 19 Pro: No
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,884 vs 1,734+9%
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- Memory card slotYes · Camon 19 Pro: No
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.05 GHz+7%
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme345 vs 326+6%
- Weight195 g vs 204 g+5%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 8.6 mm+10%
- Charged in 30 min50% vs 47%+6%
Why is Camon 19 Pro better than Note 12 (2023)?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Note 12 (2023): Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · Note 12 (2023): Yes
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- Screen-to-body ratio86.2% vs 88.2%+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 195 g | 204 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 164.4 mm | 166.8 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 74.6 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colours | Volcanic Grey, Tuscany Blue, Alpine White | Polar Blue, Eco Black, Mondrian |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 480 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 479 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.2% | 88.2% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.05 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 550,994 | 348,546 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,884 | 1,734 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 345 | 326 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.7" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2.1× |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | 47% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -28.7 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 10.6 | HIOS 13 |
