- android.gs
- Compare
- Camon 19 Pro 5G vs Redmi K40S
Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi K40S
What Camon 19 Pro 5G does better (7) and where Redmi K40S wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.3Display7.9
7.7Camera8.0
6.0Battery5.5
6.5Features6.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Camon 19 Pro 5GRedmi K40S
| Camon 19 Pro 5G | Redmi K40S | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.7 mm | 163.2 mm | +3.5 mm |
| Width | 74.3 mm | 76 mm | −1.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 7.7 mm | +0.9 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Camon 19 Pro 5G better than Redmi K40S?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+11%
- Main camera64 MP vs 48 MP+33%
- Memory card slotYes · Redmi K40S: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Redmi K40S: No
- Process6 nm vs 7 nm+17%
- Main camera aperturef/1.6 vs f/1.8+12%
- Screen-to-body ratio88.7% vs 86.6%+2%
Why is Redmi K40S better than Camon 19 Pro 5G?
- Wired charging33 W vs 67 W2×
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- OLED panelNo · Camon 19 Pro 5G: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Camon 19 Pro 5G: Yes
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+33%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Camon 19 Pro 5G: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 6+50%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
- Thickness8.6 mm vs 7.7 mm+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | — | 195 g |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 7.7 mm |
| Height | 166.7 mm | 163.2 mm |
| Width | 74.3 mm | 76 mm |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Eco Black, Cedar Green | Black, Gray, Blue, Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,300 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.7% | 86.6% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 650 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 79% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HiOS 8.6 | MIUI 13 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A53 5GvsTecno Camon 19 Pro 5G7.47.5
vsXiaomi Redmi Note 12 ProvsTecno Camon 19 Pro 5G7.47.5
vsGoogle Pixel 6avsTecno Camon 19 Pro 5G7.57.5
vsNothing Phone (1)vsTecno Camon 19 Pro 5G7.77.5
vsXiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+vsTecno Camon 19 Pro 5G7.67.5
vsTecno Camon 20 ProvsTecno Camon 19 Pro 5G6.67.5