- android.gs
- Compare
- Camon 17 Pro vs Camon 19 Pro
Tecno Camon 17 Pro vs Tecno Camon 19 Pro
What Camon 17 Pro does better (9) and where Camon 19 Pro wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.4Display6.1
2.9Performance3.2
7.6Camera8.2
6.0Battery6.0
3.5Features4.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Camon 17 ProCamon 19 Pro
| Camon 17 Pro | Camon 19 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 168.9 mm | 166.8 mm | +2.1 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 74.6 mm | +2.4 mm |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 8.6 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Weight | 201 g | 204 g | −3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Camon 17 Pro better than Camon 19 Pro?
- Memory card slotYes · Camon 19 Pro: No
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Camon 19 Pro: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- Measured brightness538 nits vs 479 nits+12%
- Peak brightness500 nits vs 480 nits+4%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Selfie camera48 MP vs 32 MP+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
- Loudspeaker loudness-24.4 LUFS vs -28.7 LUFS+-15%
Why is Camon 19 Pro better than Camon 17 Pro?
- Optical stabilisationNo · Camon 17 Pro: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · Camon 17 Pro: Yes
- NFCNo · Camon 17 Pro: Yes
- AnTuTu score309,107 vs 348,546+13%
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,668 vs 1,734+4%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.6+12%
- Thickness9 mm vs 8.6 mm+5%
- Screen-to-body ratio84.4% vs 88.2%+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 201 g | 204 g |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 168.9 mm | 166.8 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 74.6 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Colours | California Silver, Malibu Blue | Polar Blue, Eco Black, Mondrian |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 480 nits |
| Measured brightness | 538 nits | 479 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.4% | 88.2% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.05 GHz | 2.05 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 309,107 | 348,546 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,668 | 1,734 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 326 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.72" | 1/1.7" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2.1× |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 48 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 47% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -24.4 LUFS | -28.7 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HiOS 7.6 | HIOS 13 |
