- android.gs
- Compare
- Xperia 10 III vs Camon 17 Pro
Sony Xperia 10 III vs Tecno Camon 17 Pro
What Xperia 10 III does better (11) and where Camon 17 Pro wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.3Display5.4
2.6Performance2.9
6.2Camera7.6
3.2Battery6.0
6.6Features3.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Xperia 10 IIICamon 17 Pro
| Xperia 10 III | Camon 17 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 154 mm | 168.9 mm | −14.9 mm |
| Width | 68 mm | 77 mm | −9 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 9 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Weight | 169 g | 201 g | −32 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Xperia 10 III better than Camon 17 Pro?
- OLED panelYes · Camon 17 Pro: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · Camon 17 Pro: No
- 5GYes · Camon 17 Pro: No
- NFCYes · Camon 17 Pro: No
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,738 vs 1,668+4%
- Weight169 g vs 201 g+19%
- Pixel density457 ppi vs 395 ppi+16%
- Measured brightness559 nits vs 538 nits+4%
- USB version3.1 vs 2+55%
- Process8 nm vs 12 nm+50%
- Thickness8.3 mm vs 9 mm+8%
Why is Camon 17 Pro better than Xperia 10 III?
- Main camera12 MP vs 64 MP5.3×
- Wired charging21 W vs 33 W+57%
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 90 Hz+50%
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+11%
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- AnTuTu score286,216 vs 309,107+8%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 48 MP6×
- Screen size6″ vs 6.8″+13%
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.05 GHz+2%
- Loudspeaker loudness-28.2 LUFS vs -24.4 LUFS+-13%
- Screen-to-body ratio80.3% vs 84.4%+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 169 g | 201 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 9 mm |
| Height | 154 mm | 168.9 mm |
| Width | 68 mm | 77 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | — |
| Colours | Black, White, Blue, Pink | California Silver, Malibu Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | OLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,520 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 457 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 500 nits |
| Measured brightness | 559 nits | 538 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 80.3% | 84.4% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6350 Snapdragon 690 5G | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.05 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| AnTuTu score | 286,216 | 309,107 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,738 | 1,668 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 12 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.8" | 1/1.72" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 48 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 21 W | 33 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.2 LUFS | -24.4 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HiOS 7.6 |
