- android.gs
- Compare
- NxtPaper 60 Ultra vs T4 Ultra
TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra vs Vivo T4 Ultra
What NxtPaper 60 Ultra does better (4) and where T4 Ultra wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Display9.3
9.0Camera9.0
7.5Battery8.7
8.5Features7.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
NxtPaper 60 UltraT4 Ultra
| NxtPaper 60 Ultra | T4 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 174.5 mm | 160.6 mm | +13.9 mm |
| Width | 81.2 mm | 75 mm | +6.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 7.5 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 227 g | 192 g | +35 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is NxtPaper 60 Ultra better than T4 Ultra?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- eSIMYes · T4 Ultra: No
- Screen size7.2″ vs 6.7″+8%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is T4 Ultra better than NxtPaper 60 Ultra?
- Wired charging33 W vs 90 W2.7×
- Peak brightness850 nits vs 5,000 nits5.9×
- OLED panelNo · NxtPaper 60 Ultra: Yes
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+6%
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 3.4 GHz+31%
- Pixel density358 ppi vs 460 ppi+28%
- Weight227 g vs 192 g+18%
- Charged in 30 min50% vs 62%+24%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,260 px+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 227 g | 192 g |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 174.5 mm | 160.6 mm |
| Width | 81.2 mm | 75 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Lunar White, Nebula Black | Phoenix Gold, Meteor Grey |
| Stylus | Yes | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 7.2″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 358 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 850 nits | 5,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.8% | 89.2% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 2,286,808 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 6,749 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.55" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3× | 3× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 5,500 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 90 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | 62% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.99 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | Funtouch 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 51 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | B | — |
