- android.gs
- Compare
- 50 Pro NxtPaper vs Camon 30 5G
TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
What 50 Pro NxtPaper does better (9) and where Camon 30 5G wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.3Display8.6
7.4Camera8.0
7.1Battery7.3
7.4Features5.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
50 Pro NxtPaperCamon 30 5G
| 50 Pro NxtPaper | Camon 30 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 167.6 mm | 165.4 mm | +2.2 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 75.9 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.8 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 196 g | 199 g | −3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 50 Pro NxtPaper better than Camon 30 5G?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- Stereo speakersYes · Camon 30 5G: No
- Storage (base)512 GB vs 8 GB64×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Camon 30 5G: No
- eSIMYes · Camon 30 5G: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Camon 30 5G: No
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is Camon 30 5G better than 50 Pro NxtPaper?
- Wired charging33 W vs 70 W2.1×
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- OLED panelNo · 50 Pro NxtPaper: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · 50 Pro NxtPaper: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 50 MP+56%
- Thickness8 mm vs 7.8 mm+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 196 g | 199 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 167.6 mm | 165.4 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 75.9 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Colours | Moon Gray, Midnight Blue, Alps White, Pale Gold, Rosy Purple | Iceland Basaltic Dark, Uyuni Salt White, Emerald Lake Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.8% | 87.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 | Mediatek Dimensity 7020 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 723,262 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,311 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 512 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/1.57" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,010 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 70 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 67% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer (T803D only) | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HIOS 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | 2 | 2 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 44 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | B | — |
