- android.gs
- Compare
- Xperia 5 II vs NEX 3S 5G
Sony Xperia 5 II vs Vivo NEX 3S 5G
What Xperia 5 II does better (11) and where NEX 3S 5G wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.1Display7.0
8.6Camera7.4
2.9Battery4.8
8.0Features7.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Xperia 5 IINEX 3S 5G
| Xperia 5 II | NEX 3S 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 158 mm | 167.4 mm | −9.4 mm |
| Width | 68 mm | 76.1 mm | −8.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 9.4 mm | −1.4 mm |
| Weight | 163 g | 220 g | −56 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Xperia 5 II better than NEX 3S 5G?
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · NEX 3S 5G: No
- Stereo speakersYes · NEX 3S 5G: No
- Optical zoom3× vs 2×+50%
- 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 30 fps4×
- Weight163 g vs 220 g+35%
- Pixel density449 ppi vs 363 ppi+24%
- Memory card slotYes · NEX 3S 5G: No
- USB version3.1 vs 2+55%
- Thickness8 mm vs 9.4 mm+18%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
Why is NEX 3S 5G better than Xperia 5 II?
- Main camera12 MP vs 64 MP5.3×
- Wired charging21 W vs 44 W2.1×
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Battery capacity4,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+12%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Screen size6.1″ vs 6.9″+13%
- Screen-to-body ratio80.9% vs 93.6%+16%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 163 g | 220 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 9.4 mm |
| Height | 158 mm | 167.4 mm |
| Width | 68 mm | 76.1 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | — |
| Colours | Black, Grey, Blue, Pink | Black, Blue, Orange |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.1″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | OLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,520 px | 2,256 px |
| Pixel density | 449 ppi | 363 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 550 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 600 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 80.9% | 93.6% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.84 GHz | 2.84 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 |
| AnTuTu score | 532,655 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,301 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,104 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 12 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/1.72" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3× | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 120 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Wired charging | 21 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.3 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | Funtouch 10.0 |
