- android.gs
- Compare
- Aquos Zero 2 vs Xperia 5 II
Sharp Aquos Zero 2 vs Sony Xperia 5 II
What Aquos Zero 2 does better (6) and where Xperia 5 II wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.4Display7.1
7.1Camera8.6
2.5Battery2.9
8.3Features8.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Aquos Zero 2Xperia 5 II
| Aquos Zero 2 | Xperia 5 II | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 158 mm | 158 mm | = |
| Width | 74 mm | 68 mm | +6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 8 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Weight | 141 g | 163 g | −22 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Aquos Zero 2 better than Xperia 5 II?
- Refresh rate240 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx5+60%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Weight141 g vs 163 g+16%
- Screen size6.4″ vs 6.1″+5%
- Screen-to-body ratio86% vs 80.9%+6%
Why is Xperia 5 II better than Aquos Zero 2?
- Battery capacity3,130 mAh vs 4,000 mAh+28%
- Telephoto cameraNo · Aquos Zero 2: Yes
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 120 fps4×
- Memory card slotNo · Aquos Zero 2: Yes
- Dual SIMNo · Aquos Zero 2: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Aquos Zero 2: Yes
- Pixel density403 ppi vs 449 ppi+11%
- USB version2 vs 3.1+55%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Thickness8.8 mm vs 8 mm+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 141 g | 163 g |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 158 mm | 158 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 68 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx5 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Colours | Blue | Black, Grey, Blue, Pink |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.1″ |
| Panel | OLED | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,520 px |
| Pixel density | 403 ppi | 449 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 550 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 600 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86% | 80.9% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.84 GHz | 2.84 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 640 | Adreno 650 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 532,655 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,301 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,104 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 12 MP | 12 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.55" | 1/1.7" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 3× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 120 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 3,130 mAh | 4,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | — | 21 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 50% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.1 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -28.3 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
