- android.gs
- Compare
- XP Pro vs Camon 30
Sonim XP Pro vs Tecno Camon 30
What XP Pro does better (11) and where Camon 30 wins (10) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
XP ProCamon 30
| XP Pro | Camon 30 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 171 mm | 165.3 mm | +5.7 mm |
| Width | 80 mm | 75.3 mm | +4.7 mm |
| Thickness | 12 mm | 7.7 mm | +4.3 mm |
| Weight | 277 g | 198 g | +80 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is XP Pro better than Camon 30?
- Wireless chargingYes · Camon 30: No
- 5GYes · Camon 30: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Camon 30: No
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 8 GB32×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Camon 30: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- eSIMYes · Camon 30: No
- CPU frequency2.63 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+20%
- Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
Why is Camon 30 better than XP Pro?
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- OLED panelNo · XP Pro: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · XP Pro: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 50 MP3.1×
- Weight277 g vs 198 g+40%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · XP Pro: Yes
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+3%
- Thickness12 mm vs 7.7 mm+56%
- Screen-to-body ratio76.2% vs 88.3%+16%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 277 g | 198 g |
| Thickness | 12 mm | 7.7 mm |
| Height | 171 mm | 165.3 mm |
| Width | 80 mm | 75.3 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | — |
| Colours | Black | Iceland Basaltic Dark, Uyuni Salt White, Sahara Sand Brown |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,408 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 401 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 76.2% | 88.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 | Mediatek Helio G99 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.63 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 720 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 591,209 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,976 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.57" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | — | 70 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 67% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HIOS 16 |
| Major OS updates promised | 2 | 2 |
