How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. XP Pro Thermal vs X200 Ultra

Sonim XP Pro Thermal vs Vivo X200 Ultra

What XP Pro Thermal does better (1) and where X200 Ultra wins (24) — every spec side by side.

Sonim XP Pro Thermal
Sonim · 2025XP Pro Thermal
7.3Score
1 advantage≈ $830
vs
Vivo X200 Ultra
Vivo · 2025X200 Ultra
9.6Score
24 advantages≈ $840
Higher score
5.5Display9.3
6.1Camera9.7
7.3Battery8.4
7.5Features9.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

XP Pro ThermalX200 Ultra
80 × 171.511.576.8 × 163.18.7
XP Pro ThermalX200 UltraDifference
Height171.5 mm163.1 mm+8.4 mm
Width80 mm76.8 mm+3.2 mm
Thickness11.5 mm8.7 mm+2.8 mm
Weight267 g229 g+38 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is XP Pro Thermal better than X200 Ultra?

  1. Memory card slotYes · X200 Ultra: No

Why is X200 Ultra better than XP Pro Thermal?

  1. RAM8 GB vs 16 GB2×
  2. Storage (max)256 GB vs 1,024 GB4×
  3. OLED panelNo · XP Pro Thermal: Yes
  4. Optical stabilisationNo · XP Pro Thermal: Yes
  5. Telephoto cameraNo · XP Pro Thermal: Yes
  6. Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
  7. Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
  8. CPU frequency2.63 GHz vs 4.32 GHz+64%
  9. 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 120 fps4×
  10. Selfie camera16 MP vs 50 MP3.1×
  11. Pixel density401 ppi vs 510 ppi+27%
  12. Rear cameras1 vs 22×
Specifications

Side by side

Vivo X200 UltraVivo X200 Ultra≈ $8409.6
Design
Weight267 g229 g
Thickness11.5 mm8.7 mm
Height171.5 mm163.1 mm
Width80 mm76.8 mm
Frame—Aluminium
Back—Glass
Ingress protectionIP68IP69
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx9
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass Victus 2Armor glass
ColoursBlackBlack, Silver, Red
Display
Screen size6.6″6.8″
PanelIPS LCDLTPO AMOLED
OLED panelNoYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)—Yes
Resolution (width)1,080 px1,440 px
Resolution (height)2,408 px3,168 px
Pixel density401 ppi510 ppi
Refresh rate90 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness—4,500 nits
Measured brightness—1,816 nits
Screen-to-body ratio76%90.2%
HDR—Yes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.63 GHz4.32 GHz
GPUAdreno 720Adreno 830
AnTuTu score—2,914,061
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—9,410
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—6,816
Memory
RAM8 GB16 GB
Storage (max)256 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage type—UFS 4.1
Memory card slotYesNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperture—f/1.7
Main sensor size—1/1.28"
Rear cameras12
Optical stabilisationNoYes
Ultra-wide cameraNoYes
Telephoto cameraNoYes
Optical zoom—3.7×
Max video4K8K
4K video frame rate30 fps120 fps
Selfie camera16 MP50 MP
4K selfie videoNoYes
Battery
Battery capacity5,000 mAh6,000 mAh
Battery type—Si/C
Active use (test)—13.6 h
Wired charging—90 W
Charged in 30 min—64%
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power—40 W
Reverse wireless charging—Yes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMNoYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.35.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C 3.2
USB version—3.2
Video output—Yes
Satellite messaging—Yes
Infrared port—Yes
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGALILEOGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-24.4 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideUnder display, ultrasonic
BarometerYes—
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—OriginOS 5
Major OS updates promised2—
EU label
Energy classC—
Battery charge cycles1,000—
Endurance per cycle41 h—
Repairability classC—
Drop resistance classA—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare