- android.gs
- Compare
- Aquos sense9 vs T3 Ultra
Sharp Aquos sense9 vs Vivo T3 Ultra
What Aquos sense9 does better (6) and where T3 Ultra wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.7Display9.4
8.8Camera9.1
6.4Battery8.5
8.4Features6.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Aquos sense9T3 Ultra
| Aquos sense9 | T3 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 149 mm | 164.2 mm | −15.2 mm |
| Width | 73 mm | 74.9 mm | −1.9 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 7.6 mm | +1.3 mm |
| Weight | 166 g | 192 g | −26 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Aquos sense9 better than T3 Ultra?
- Refresh rate240 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- NFCYes · T3 Ultra: No
- Memory card slotYes · T3 Ultra: No
- eSIMYes · T3 Ultra: No
- Weight166 g vs 192 g+16%
- USB version3.2 vs 2+60%
Why is T3 Ultra better than Aquos sense9?
- Wired charging36 W vs 80 W2.2×
- Peak brightness2,000 nits vs 4,500 nits2.2×
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+10%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 3.35 GHz+40%
- 4K selfie videoNo · Aquos sense9: Yes
- Screen size6.1″ vs 6.8″+11%
- Pixel density422 ppi vs 453 ppi+7%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 50 MP+56%
- Thickness8.9 mm vs 7.6 mm+17%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,260 px+17%
- Screen-to-body ratio84% vs 90.2%+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 166 g | 192 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 149 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 73 mm | 74.9 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Aluminium | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Schott Xensation Alpha |
| Colours | Black, White, Green, Coral, Greige, Blue | Lunar Gray, Frost Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.1″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | LTPO IGZO OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 422 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,000 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84% | 90.2% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 | Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 3.35 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Immortalis-G715 MC11 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,870,185 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 5,471 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.55" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,500 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 36 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 54% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| Video output | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.99 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | Funtouch 14 |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
