- android.gs
- Compare
- Aquos sense7 vs Poco F5 Pro
Sharp Aquos sense7 vs Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
What Aquos sense7 does better (6) and where Poco F5 Pro wins (20) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.8Display8.6
6.7Camera9.2
3.1Battery8.6
8.4Features6.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Aquos sense7Poco F5 Pro
| Aquos sense7 | Poco F5 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 152 mm | 162.8 mm | −10.8 mm |
| Width | 70 mm | 75.4 mm | −5.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.6 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Weight | 158 g | 204 g | −46 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Aquos sense7 better than Poco F5 Pro?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx32.7×
- Weight158 g vs 204 g+29%
- Memory card slotYes · Poco F5 Pro: No
- eSIMYes · Poco F5 Pro: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Poco F5 Pro: No
- Thickness8 mm vs 8.6 mm+7%
Why is Poco F5 Pro better than Aquos sense7?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- RAM6 GB vs 12 GB2×
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 512 GB4×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Aquos sense7: Yes
- Wireless chargingNo · Aquos sense7: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Aquos sense7: Yes
- Battery capacity4,570 mAh vs 5,160 mAh+13%
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+27%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 3 GHz+36%
- Pixel density436 ppi vs 526 ppi+21%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 16 MP2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 158 g | 204 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 152 mm | 162.8 mm |
| Width | 70 mm | 75.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black | Black, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.1″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IGZO OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,432 px | 3,200 px |
| Pixel density | 436 ppi | 526 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 1,400 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,059 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.7% | 87.5% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 730 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,057,977 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 4,001 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 2,110 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.55" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,570 mAh | 5,160 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | — | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 100% |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 30 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.2 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted); unspecified sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 1 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS 3 |
