- android.gs
- Compare
- Aquos sense7 plus vs iQOO Neo 7
Sharp Aquos sense7 plus vs Vivo iQOO Neo 7
What Aquos sense7 plus does better (9) and where iQOO Neo 7 wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.8Display8.1
6.7Camera7.9
7.3Battery7.8
9.2Features8.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Aquos sense7 plusiQOO Neo 7
| Aquos sense7 plus | iQOO Neo 7 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 160 mm | 164.8 mm | −4.8 mm |
| Width | 76 mm | 76.9 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.6 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Weight | 172 g | 193 g | −21 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Aquos sense7 plus better than iQOO Neo 7?
- Memory card slotYes · iQOO Neo 7: No
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · iQOO Neo 7: No
- eSIMYes · iQOO Neo 7: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · iQOO Neo 7: No
- Weight172 g vs 193 g+12%
- Pixel density403 ppi vs 388 ppi+4%
- USB version3 vs 2+50%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 8.6 mm+5%
Why is iQOO Neo 7 better than Aquos sense7 plus?
- RAM6 GB vs 12 GB2×
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Aquos sense7 plus: Yes
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+27%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 3.1 GHz+41%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Screen size6.4″ vs 6.8″+6%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Screen-to-body ratio82.7% vs 87.6%+6%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
- Bluetooth5.1 vs 5.3+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 172 g | 193 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 160 mm | 164.8 mm |
| Width | 76 mm | 76.9 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Colours | Moon silver | Interstellar Black, Frost Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IGZO OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 403 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.7% | 87.6% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,241,266 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,292 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,790 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.55" | 1/1.97" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,050 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | — | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 150% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted); unspecified sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | Funtouch 13 |
