android.gs
Compare
Aquos R9 vs 15T Pro

Sharp Aquos R9 vs Xiaomi 15T Pro

What Aquos R9 does better (4) and where 15T Pro wins (17) — every spec side by side.

Sharp · 2024Aquos R9

8.6Score

4 advantages≈ $590

Xiaomi · 202515T Pro

9.7Score

17 advantages≈ $580

Higher score

8.3Display9.7

8.7Camera9.8

5.6Battery9.2

9.0Features9.7

Dimensions

Size comparison

Aquos R915T Pro

	Aquos R9	15T Pro	Difference
Height	156 mm	162.7 mm	−6.7 mm
Width	75 mm	77.9 mm	−2.9 mm
Thickness	8.9 mm	8 mm	+0.9 mm
Weight	195 g	210 g	−15 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Aquos R9 better than 15T Pro?

Refresh rate240 Hz vs 144 Hz+67%
Memory card slotYes · 15T Pro: No
Weight195 g vs 210 g+8%
Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+57%

Why is 15T Pro better than Aquos R9?

Storage (max)256 GB vs 1,024 GB4×
Telephoto cameraNo · Aquos R9: Yes
Wireless chargingNo · Aquos R9: Yes
Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+10%
Peak brightness2,000 nits vs 3,200 nits+60%
4K video frame rate30 fps vs 120 fps4×
CPU frequency2.8 GHz vs 3.63 GHz+30%
Max video4K vs 8K
4K selfie videoNo · Aquos R9: Yes
Pixel density396 ppi vs 447 ppi+13%
Screen size6.5″ vs 6.8″+5%
Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Sharp Aquos R9≈ $5908.6	Xiaomi 15T Pro≈ $5809.7
Design
Weight	195 g	210 g
Thickness	8.9 mm	8 mm
Height	156 mm	162.7 mm
Width	75 mm	77.9 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Aluminium
Back	Glass	Plastic
Ingress protection	IP68	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass 5	Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
Colours	Snow White, Forest Green	Black, Gray, Mocha Gold
Display
Screen size	6.5″	6.8″
Panel	PRO IGZO LTPO OLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	Yes	—
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,280 px
Resolution (height)	2,340 px	2,772 px
Pixel density	396 ppi	447 ppi
Refresh rate	240 Hz	144 Hz
Peak brightness	2,000 nits	3,200 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,419 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	88.6%	90.4%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM7675-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3	Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
Chip maker	Qualcomm	MediaTek
Process	4 nm	3 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.8 GHz	3.63 GHz
GPU	Adreno 732	Immortalis-G925
AnTuTu score	—	2,683,380
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	7,914
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	5,887
Memory
RAM	12 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	1,024 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.0	UFS 4.1
Memory card slot	Yes	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.9	f/1.6
Main sensor size	1/1.55"	1/1.31"
Rear cameras	2	3
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	Yes
Optical zoom	—	5×
Max video	4K	8K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	120 fps
Selfie camera	50 MP	32 MP
4K selfie video	No	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	5,000 mAh	5,500 mAh
Battery type	—	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	16.4 h
Wired charging	—	90 W
Charged in 30 min	—	83%
Wireless charging	No	Yes
Wireless charging power	—	50 W
Reverse wireless charging	—	Yes
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.4	6
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	—	2
Infrared port	—	Yes
Dual-band GPS	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-24.8 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)	—	0.99 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	HyperOS 3
Major OS updates promised	3	—
EU label
Energy class	—	A
Battery charge cycles	—	1,600
Endurance per cycle	—	58 h
Repairability class	—	C
Drop resistance class	—	A