How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Aquos R8s vs 14

Sharp Aquos R8s vs Xiaomi 14

What Aquos R8s does better (4) and where 14 wins (19) — every spec side by side.

Sharp Aquos R8s
Sharp · 2023Aquos R8s
7.3Score
4 advantages≈ $760
vs
Xiaomi 14
Xiaomi · 202314
9.2Score
19 advantages≈ $750
Higher score
7.5Display8.0
6.2Camera9.5
3.0Battery7.3
8.9Features9.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

Aquos R8s14
74 × 1598.771.5 × 152.88.2
Aquos R8s14Difference
Height159 mm152.8 mm+6.2 mm
Width74 mm71.5 mm+2.5 mm
Thickness8.7 mm8.2 mm+0.5 mm
Weight179 g188 g−9 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Aquos R8s better than 14?

  1. Battery capacity4,750 mAh vs 4,610 mAh+3%
  2. Memory card slotYes · 14: No
  3. 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · 14: No
  4. Weight179 g vs 188 g+5%

Why is 14 better than Aquos R8s?

  1. Wired charging15 W vs 90 W6×
  2. RAM8 GB vs 16 GB2×
  3. Storage (max)256 GB vs 1,024 GB4×
  4. Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 3,000 nits2.3×
  5. Optical stabilisationNo · Aquos R8s: Yes
  6. Telephoto cameraNo · Aquos R8s: Yes
  7. Wireless chargingNo · Aquos R8s: Yes
  8. Stereo speakersNo · Aquos R8s: Yes
  9. Selfie camera8 MP vs 32 MP4×
  10. 4K selfie videoNo · Aquos R8s: Yes
  11. Pixel density403 ppi vs 460 ppi+14%
  12. CPU frequency3.2 GHz vs 3.3 GHz+3%
Specifications

Side by side

Sharp Aquos R8sSharp Aquos R8s≈ $7607.3
Xiaomi 14Xiaomi 14≈ $7509.2
Design
Weight179 g188 g
Thickness8.7 mm8.2 mm
Height159 mm152.8 mm
Width74 mm71.5 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackPlasticGlass
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass 3Corning Gorilla Glass Victus
ColoursBlue, WhiteBlack, White, Jade Green, Pink
Display
Screen size6.4″6.4″
PanelPRO IGZO LTPO OLEDLTPO OLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)1,080 px1,200 px
Resolution (height)2,340 px2,670 px
Pixel density403 ppi460 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,300 nits3,000 nits
Measured brightness—1,175 nits
Screen-to-body ratio85.5%89.3%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.2 GHz3.3 GHz
GPUAdreno 740Adreno 750
AnTuTu score—2,003,429
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—6,810
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—4,567
Memory
RAM8 GB16 GB
Storage (max)256 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.0
Memory card slotYesNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.9f/1.6
Main sensor size1/1.55"1/1.31"
Rear cameras23
Optical stabilisationNoYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoYes
Optical zoom—3.2×
Max video—8K
4K video frame rate—60 fps
Selfie camera8 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoNoYes
Battery
Battery capacity4,750 mAh4,610 mAh
Battery type—Li-Po
Active use (test)—13.9 h
Wired charging15 W90 W
Charged in 30 min—97%
Wireless chargingNoYes
Wireless charging power—50 W
Reverse wireless charging—Yes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.35.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.0USB Type-C 3.2
USB version33.2
Video output—Yes
Infrared port—Yes
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersNoYes
3.5 mm headphone jackYesNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-25.3 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideUnder display
Barometer—Yes
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer
SAR (head)—1 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 13Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—HyperOS 1.1
Major OS updates promised—4
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare