- android.gs
- Compare
- Aquos R7s vs Phantom X2 Pro
Sharp Aquos R7s vs Tecno Phantom X2 Pro
What Aquos R7s does better (8) and where Phantom X2 Pro wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.3Display7.4
6.8Camera8.2
5.4Battery7.8
8.9Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Aquos R7sPhantom X2 Pro
| Aquos R7s | Phantom X2 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161 mm | 164.6 mm | −3.6 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 72.7 mm | +4.3 mm |
| Thickness | 9.3 mm | 9 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 208 g | 201 g | +7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Aquos R7s better than Phantom X2 Pro?
- Stereo speakersYes · Phantom X2 Pro: No
- Memory card slotYes · Phantom X2 Pro: No
- Max video8K vs 4K
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Phantom X2 Pro: No
- Pixel density456 ppi vs 387 ppi+18%
- USB version3 vs 2+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
- Resolution (width)1,260 px vs 1,080 px+17%
Why is Phantom X2 Pro better than Aquos R7s?
- Wired charging27 W vs 45 W+67%
- Telephoto cameraNo · Aquos R7s: Yes
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,160 mAh+3%
- Rear cameras1 vs 33×
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 32 MP2.5×
- Main camera47 MP vs 50 MP+6%
- Weight208 g vs 201 g+3%
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+3%
- Screen-to-body ratio86.3% vs 93.3%+8%
- Thickness9.3 mm vs 9 mm+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 208 g | 201 g |
| Thickness | 9.3 mm | 9 mm |
| Height | 161 mm | 164.6 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 72.7 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Black | Stardust Gray, Mars Orange |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | PRO IGZO OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,260 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,730 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 456 ppi | 387 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 500 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 505 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.3% | 93.3% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | Mediatek Dimensity 9000 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 3.05 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G710 MC10 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 961,576 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,984 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 47 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1" | 1/1.3" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2.5× |
| Max video | 8K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,160 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Wired charging | 27 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 81% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -29.3 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HiOS 8.6 |
