- android.gs
- Compare
- X9b vs Aquos R7s
Honor X9b vs Sharp Aquos R7s
What X9b does better (11) and where Aquos R7s wins (10) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
X9bAquos R7s
| X9b | Aquos R7s | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.6 mm | 161 mm | +2.6 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 77 mm | −1.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 9.3 mm | −1.3 mm |
| Weight | 185 g | 208 g | −23 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X9b better than Aquos R7s?
- Main camera108 MP vs 47 MP2.3×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Battery capacity5,800 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+16%
- Wired charging35 W vs 27 W+30%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Weight185 g vs 208 g+12%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.6″+3%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 13 MP+27%
- Thickness8 mm vs 9.3 mm+16%
- Screen-to-body ratio91.2% vs 86.3%+6%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is Aquos R7s better than X9b?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx3 vs IPx82.7×
- Stereo speakersNo · X9b: Yes
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 3 GHz+36%
- Memory card slotNo · X9b: Yes
- Max video4K vs 8K
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · X9b: Yes
- Pixel density431 ppi vs 456 ppi+6%
- USB version2 vs 3+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Resolution (width)1,220 px vs 1,260 px+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 185 g | 208 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 9.3 mm |
| Height | 163.6 mm | 161 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 77 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Sunrise Orange, Midnight Black, Emerald Green | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | PRO IGZO OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,220 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,652 px | 2,730 px |
| Pixel density | 431 ppi | 456 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,200 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91.2% | 86.3% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Adreno 730 |
| AnTuTu score | 701,054 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,796 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 47 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,800 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 35 W | 27 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 40% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 3 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Magic UI 8.0 | — |
