- android.gs
- Compare
- Aquos R7s vs Xperia 10 V
Sharp Aquos R7s vs Sony Xperia 10 V
What Aquos R7s does better (14) and where Xperia 10 V wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.3Display6.4
6.8Camera7.1
5.4Battery6.9
8.9Features8.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Aquos R7sXperia 10 V
| Aquos R7s | Xperia 10 V | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161 mm | 155 mm | +6 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 68 mm | +9 mm |
| Thickness | 9.3 mm | 8.3 mm | +1 mm |
| Weight | 208 g | 159 g | +49 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Aquos R7s better than Xperia 10 V?
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx5+60%
- CPU frequency3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+36%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Max video8K vs 1080p
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.1″+8%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 8 MP+57%
- Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
- USB version3 vs 2+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
Why is Xperia 10 V better than Aquos R7s?
- Optical stabilisationNo · Aquos R7s: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · Aquos R7s: Yes
- Wired charging27 W vs 30 W+11%
- Rear cameras1 vs 33×
- Weight208 g vs 159 g+31%
- eSIMNo · Aquos R7s: Yes
- Thickness9.3 mm vs 8.3 mm+12%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 208 g | 159 g |
| Thickness | 9.3 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 161 mm | 155 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 68 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx5 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Black | Black, White, Sage Green, Lavender |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.1″ |
| Panel | PRO IGZO OLED | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,260 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,730 px | 2,520 px |
| Pixel density | 456 ppi | 449 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 947 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.3% | 82.5% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 619 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 357,142 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,897 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 47 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Max video | 8K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 16.2 h |
| Wired charging | 27 W | 30 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 37% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -27.4 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
