- android.gs
- Compare
- Aquos R11 vs Camon 50 Pro
Sharp Aquos R11 vs Tecno Camon 50 Pro
What Aquos R11 does better (7) and where Camon 50 Pro wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.6Display9.7
9.2Camera9.1
7.4Battery8.5
9.0Features7.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Aquos R11Camon 50 Pro
| Aquos R11 | Camon 50 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 156 mm | 162.4 mm | −6.4 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 77 mm | −3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 7.8 mm | +1.1 mm |
| Weight | 195 g | 175 g | +20 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Aquos R11 better than Camon 50 Pro?
- Refresh rate240 Hz vs 144 Hz+67%
- CPU frequency3.21 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+23%
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- eSIMYes · Camon 50 Pro: No
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 4+75%
- USB version3.2 vs 2+60%
- Bluetooth6 vs 5.3+13%
Why is Camon 50 Pro better than Aquos R11?
- Battery capacity5,100 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+27%
- Wired charging36 W vs 45 W+25%
- Memory card slotNo · Aquos R11: Yes
- Weight195 g vs 175 g+11%
- Pixel density396 ppi vs 429 ppi+8%
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.8″+4%
- Thickness8.9 mm vs 7.8 mm+14%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,208 px+12%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 195 g | 175 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 156 mm | 162.4 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 77 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Colours | Navy, Ivory, Terracotta | Moonshadow Black, Cypress Green, Nebula Titanium, Misty Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | PRO IGZO LTPO OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,208 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,644 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 429 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,600 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.8% | 89.6% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8735 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.21 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 825 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,059,715 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,199 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.55" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3× | 3× |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,100 mAh | 6,500 mAh |
| Wired charging | 36 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 6 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HIOS 16 |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | 3 |
