How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Galaxy Z Fold 3 vs Mix Flip

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 vs Xiaomi Mix Flip

What Galaxy Z Fold 3 does better (9) and where Mix Flip wins (15) — every spec side by side.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3
Samsung · 2021Galaxy Z Fold 3
5.8Score
9 advantages≈ $790
vs
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Xiaomi · 2024Mix Flip
8.1Score
15 advantages≈ $720
Higher score
5.5Display7.7
4.6Camera6.4
4.0Battery7.0
5.3Features6.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy Z Fold 3Mix Flip
128.1 × 158.26.474 × 167.57.6
Galaxy Z Fold 3Mix FlipDifference
Height158.2 mm167.5 mm−9.3 mm
Width128.1 mm74 mm+54.1 mm
Thickness6.4 mm7.6 mm−1.2 mm
Weight271 g190 g+81 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy Z Fold 3 better than Mix Flip?

  1. Wireless chargingYes · Mix Flip: No
  2. Ultra-wide cameraYes · Mix Flip: No
  3. eSIMYes · Mix Flip: No
  4. Screen-to-body ratio171.3% vs 87.5%+96%
  5. Screen size7.6″ vs 6.9″+11%
  6. USB version3.2 vs 2+60%
  7. Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
  8. Resolution (width)1,768 px vs 1,224 px+44%
  9. Thickness6.4 mm vs 7.6 mm+19%

Why is Mix Flip better than Galaxy Z Fold 3?

  1. Main camera12 MP vs 50 MP4.2×
  2. Wired charging25 W vs 67 W2.7×
  3. Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
  4. Stereo speakersNo · Galaxy Z Fold 3: Yes
  5. RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
  6. Battery capacity4,400 mAh vs 4,780 mAh+9%
  7. Selfie camera4 MP vs 32 MP8×
  8. Weight271 g vs 190 g+43%
  9. Pixel density374 ppi vs 460 ppi+23%
  10. Max video4K vs 8K
  11. Dual SIMNo · Galaxy Z Fold 3: Yes
  12. CPU frequency2.8 GHz vs 3.3 GHz+18%
Specifications

Side by side

Xiaomi Mix FlipXiaomi Mix Flip≈ $7208.1
Design
Weight271 g190 g
Thickness6.4 mm7.6 mm
Height158.2 mm167.5 mm
Width128.1 mm74 mm
Frame—Aluminium
Back—Glass
Ingress protectionIPX8—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8—
Glass protectionGorilla Glass Victus—
ColoursPhantom Silver, Phantom Black, Phantom GreenBlack, White, Purple
Display
Screen size7.6″6.9″
PanelDynamic Amoled 2XFoldable LTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)—Yes
Resolution (width)1,768 px1,224 px
Resolution (height)2,208 px2,912 px
Pixel density374 ppi460 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness—3,000 nits
Measured brightness—1,314 nits
Screen-to-body ratio171.3%87.5%
HDRYesYes
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 888Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process—4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.8 GHz3.3 GHz
GPUAdreno 660Adreno 750
AnTuTu score—1,609,570
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—6,035
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—4,209
Memory
RAM12 GB16 GB
Storage (max)512 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage type—UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera12 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.7
Main sensor size—1/1.55"
Rear cameras32
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesNo
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom2×2×
Max video4K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera4 MP32 MP
4K selfie video—Yes
Battery
Battery capacity4,400 mAh4,780 mAh
Active use (test)—12 h
Wired charging25 W67 W
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power11 W—
Reverse wireless chargingYes—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMNoYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.25.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C 2.0
USB version3.22
Ultra WidebandYes—
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersNoYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-27.6 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
Barometer—Yes
Sensorsproximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, compass, hall, fingerprintFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
SAR (head)—1 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 11Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceOne UI 3.1HyperOS 3
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare