- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy Z Fold 3 vs X Flip
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 vs Vivo X Flip
What Galaxy Z Fold 3 does better (10) and where X Flip wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.5Display5.1
4.6Camera5.2
4.0Battery4.7
5.3Features3.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy Z Fold 3X Flip
| Galaxy Z Fold 3 | X Flip | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 158.2 mm | 166.4 mm | −8.2 mm |
| Width | 128.1 mm | 75.3 mm | +52.8 mm |
| Thickness | 6.4 mm | 7.8 mm | −1.4 mm |
| Weight | 271 g | 198 g | +73 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy Z Fold 3 better than X Flip?
- Telephoto cameraYes · X Flip: No
- Wireless chargingYes · X Flip: No
- Screen-to-body ratio171.3% vs 84.7%2×
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- eSIMYes · X Flip: No
- Screen size7.6″ vs 6.7″+13%
- Resolution (width)1,768 px vs 1,080 px+64%
- USB version3.2 vs 2+60%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Thickness6.4 mm vs 7.8 mm+22%
Why is X Flip better than Galaxy Z Fold 3?
- Main camera12 MP vs 50 MP4.2×
- Wired charging25 W vs 44 W+76%
- Selfie camera4 MP vs 32 MP8×
- Weight271 g vs 198 g+37%
- Dual SIMNo · Galaxy Z Fold 3: Yes
- Pixel density374 ppi vs 407 ppi+9%
- CPU frequency2.8 GHz vs 3 GHz+7%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 271 g | 198 g |
| Thickness | 6.4 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 158.2 mm | 166.4 mm |
| Width | 128.1 mm | 75.3 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IPX8 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass Victus | — |
| Colours | Phantom Silver, Phantom Black, Phantom Green | Rhombic Purple, Silk Gold, Diamond Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 7.6″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Dynamic Amoled 2X | Foldable LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,768 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,208 px | 2,520 px |
| Pixel density | 374 ppi | 407 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,027 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 171.3% | 84.7% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | — | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.8 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 730 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,060,911 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,930 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 12 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.49" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 4 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | — | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,400 mAh | 4,400 mAh |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 44 W |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 11 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| Ultra Wideband | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -29.2 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, compass, hall, fingerprint | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 3.1 | OriginOS 3 |
