- android.gs
- Compare
- Phantom V Fold vs X Flip
Tecno Phantom V Fold vs Vivo X Flip
What Phantom V Fold does better (11) and where X Flip wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.9Display5.1
5.0Performance4.8
3.7Camera5.2
6.9Battery4.7
4.0Features3.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Phantom V FoldX Flip
| Phantom V Fold | X Flip | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159.4 mm | 166.4 mm | −7 mm |
| Width | 140.4 mm | 75.3 mm | +65.1 mm |
| Thickness | 6.9 mm | 7.8 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Weight | 299 g | 198 g | +101 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Phantom V Fold better than X Flip?
- Telephoto cameraYes · X Flip: No
- Stereo speakersYes · X Flip: No
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,400 mAh+14%
- Wired charging45 W vs 44 W+2%
- Screen size7.8″ vs 6.7″+16%
- Resolution (width)2,000 px vs 1,080 px+85%
- CPU frequency3.2 GHz vs 3 GHz+7%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Loudspeaker loudness-24.3 LUFS vs -29.2 LUFS+-17%
- Thickness6.9 mm vs 7.8 mm+13%
- Screen-to-body ratio88% vs 84.7%+4%
Why is X Flip better than Phantom V Fold?
- Measured brightness492 nits vs 1,027 nits2.1×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Phantom V Fold: Yes
- AnTuTu score999,348 vs 1,060,911+6%
- Weight299 g vs 198 g+51%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- Pixel density388 ppi vs 407 ppi+5%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 299 g | 198 g |
| Thickness | 6.9 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 159.4 mm | 166.4 mm |
| Width | 140.4 mm | 75.3 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Colours | Black, White | Rhombic Purple, Silk Gold, Diamond Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 7.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | Foldable LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 2,000 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,296 px | 2,520 px |
| Pixel density | 388 ppi | 407 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,100 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 492 nits | 1,027 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88% | 84.7% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9000+ | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G710 MC10 | Adreno 730 |
| AnTuTu score | 999,348 | 1,060,911 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,963 | 3,930 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.3" | 1/1.49" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,400 mAh |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 80% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -24.3 LUFS | -29.2 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HiOS 13 Fold | OriginOS 3 |
