- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy Z Flip 5G vs X Flip
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G vs Vivo X Flip
What Galaxy Z Flip 5G does better (8) and where X Flip wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.4Display5.1
4.3Camera5.2
2.6Battery4.7
4.7Features3.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy Z Flip 5GX Flip
| Galaxy Z Flip 5G | X Flip | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 167.3 mm | 166.4 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Width | 73.6 mm | 75.3 mm | −1.7 mm |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 7.8 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Weight | 183 g | 198 g | −15 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy Z Flip 5G better than X Flip?
- Wireless chargingYes · X Flip: No
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · X Flip: No
- eSIMYes · X Flip: No
- Weight183 g vs 198 g+8%
- Pixel density425 ppi vs 407 ppi+4%
- CPU frequency3.09 GHz vs 3 GHz+3%
- Thickness7.2 mm vs 7.8 mm+8%
Why is X Flip better than Galaxy Z Flip 5G?
- Main camera12 MP vs 50 MP4.2×
- Wired charging15 W vs 44 W2.9×
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- Battery capacity3,300 mAh vs 4,400 mAh+33%
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Selfie camera10 MP vs 32 MP3.2×
- Process7 nm vs 4 nm+75%
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.3+6%
- Screen-to-body ratio82.5% vs 84.7%+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 183 g | 198 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 167.3 mm | 166.4 mm |
| Width | 73.6 mm | 75.3 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Colours | Mystic Grey, Mystic Bronze, Mystic White | Rhombic Purple, Silk Gold, Diamond Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED | Foldable LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,636 px | 2,520 px |
| Pixel density | 425 ppi | 407 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,027 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.5% | 84.7% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G+ | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.09 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 730 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,060,911 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,930 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 12 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.55" | 1/1.49" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 10 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 3,300 mAh | 4,400 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 44 W |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 9 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -29.2 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.8 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 5 | OriginOS 3 |
