- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy Z Flip 3 vs Galaxy Z Flip 5G
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G
What Galaxy Z Flip 3 does better (7) and where Galaxy Z Flip 5G wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.4Display3.4
3.5Camera4.3
2.9Battery2.6
7.2Features4.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy Z Flip 3Galaxy Z Flip 5G
| Galaxy Z Flip 3 | Galaxy Z Flip 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166 mm | 167.3 mm | −1.3 mm |
| Width | 72.2 mm | 73.6 mm | −1.4 mm |
| Thickness | 6.9 mm | 7.2 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 183 g | 183 g | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy Z Flip 3 better than Galaxy Z Flip 5G?
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- Wired charging25 W vs 15 W+67%
- Stereo speakersYes · Galaxy Z Flip 5G: No
- Screen-to-body ratio162.7% vs 82.5%+97%
- USB version3.1 vs 2+55%
- Wireless charging power11 W vs 9 W+22%
- Thickness6.9 mm vs 7.2 mm+4%
Why is Galaxy Z Flip 5G better than Galaxy Z Flip 3?
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- CPU frequency2.8 GHz vs 3.09 GHz+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 183 g | 183 g |
| Thickness | 6.9 mm | 7.2 mm |
| Height | 166 mm | 167.3 mm |
| Width | 72.2 mm | 73.6 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IPX8 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass Victus | — |
| Colours | Cream, Phantom Black, Lavender, Green, Pink, White, Grey | Mystic Grey, Mystic Bronze, Mystic White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Dynamic Amoled 2X | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,640 px | 2,636 px |
| Pixel density | 425 ppi | 425 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 162.7% | 82.5% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G+ |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | — | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.8 GHz | 3.09 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 650 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 12 MP | 12 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.55" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 10 MP | 10 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 3,300 mAh | 3,300 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 15 W |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 11 W | 9 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, compass, barometer, hall, fingerprint | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.8 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 3.1 | One UI 5 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5GvsSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 35.55.1
vsOPPO Find N2 FlipvsSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 35.05.1
vsAsus Zenfone 8 FlipvsSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 35.35.1
vsMotorola Razr 5GvsSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 34.35.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z FlipvsSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G4.44.7vsSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 5GvsMotorola Razr 5G4.74.3