- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy S25 FE vs Civi 5 Pro
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE vs Xiaomi Civi 5 Pro
What Galaxy S25 FE does better (8) and where Civi 5 Pro wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.1Display8.7
7.9Performance8.8
9.3Camera9.2
4.8Battery8.6
9.8Features9.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy S25 FECivi 5 Pro
| Galaxy S25 FE | Civi 5 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.3 mm | 157 mm | +4.2 mm |
| Width | 76.6 mm | 73.2 mm | +3.4 mm |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 7.4 mm | = |
| Weight | 190 g | 181 g | +9 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy S25 FE better than Civi 5 Pro?
- Wireless chargingYes · Civi 5 Pro: No
- Max video8K vs 4K
- 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 60 fps2×
- eSIMYes · Civi 5 Pro: No
- Optical zoom3× vs 2.5×+20%
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.6″+2%
- USB version3.2 vs 2+60%
- CPU cores10 vs 8+25%
Why is Civi 5 Pro better than Galaxy S25 FE?
- RAM8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- AnTuTu score1,521,140 vs 2,375,195+56%
- Battery capacity4,900 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+22%
- Wired charging45 W vs 67 W+49%
- Peak brightness1,900 nits vs 3,200 nits+68%
- Selfie camera12 MP vs 50 MP4.2×
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Pixel density385 ppi vs 460 ppi+19%
- Weight190 g vs 181 g+5%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,236 px+14%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.6+12%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 7+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | 181 g |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 161.3 mm | 157 mm |
| Width | 76.6 mm | 73.2 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ | — |
| Colours | Icyblue, Jetblack, Navy, White | Gray, Rose Gold, Violet, White, Brown |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | Dynamic AMOLED 2X | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,236 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,750 px |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,900 nits | 3,200 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,247 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.2% | 90% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 2400 | Qualcomm SM8735 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 |
| Chip maker | Exynos | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 10 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3.21 GHz |
| GPU | Xclipse 940 | Adreno 825 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,521,140 | 2,375,195 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 6,948 | 6,890 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 4,262 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.57" | 1/1.55" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3× | 2.5× |
| Max video | 8K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 120 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 12 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,900 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Si/C |
| Active use (test) | 11.9 h | — |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 65% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| Video output | Yes | — |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.6 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.54 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 9 | HyperOS 2 |
| Major OS updates promised | 7 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 2,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 43 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 FEvsXiaomi Poco X7 Pro8.99.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 FEvsSamsung Galaxy S258.98.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 FEvsInfinix Note 50 Pro+8.98.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 FEvsSamsung Galaxy S24 FE8.98.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 FEvsTecno Pova 7 Ultra8.99.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 FEvsTecno Camon 40 Premier8.98.8

