android.gs
Compare
Galaxy S25 FE vs Y400

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE vs Vivo Y400

What Galaxy S25 FE does better (18) and where Y400 wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Samsung · 2025Galaxy S25 FE

8.9Score

18 advantages≈ $380

Higher score

Vivo · 2025Y400

8.4Score

6 advantages≈ $380

8.1Display8.4

9.3Camera5.9

4.8Battery9.0

9.8Features6.7

Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy S25 FEY400

	Galaxy S25 FE	Y400	Difference
Height	161.3 mm	162.3 mm	−1 mm
Width	76.6 mm	75.3 mm	+1.3 mm
Thickness	7.4 mm	7.9 mm	−0.5 mm
Weight	190 g	197 g	−7 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy S25 FE better than Y400?

Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
Optical stabilisationYes · Y400: No
Telephoto cameraYes · Y400: No
Wireless chargingYes · Y400: No
NFCYes · Y400: No
CPU frequency3.2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+45%
Rear cameras3 vs 13×
Ultra-wide cameraYes · Y400: No
Max video8K vs 1080p
4K selfie videoYes · Y400: No
eSIMYes · Y400: No
Peak brightness1,900 nits vs 1,800 nits+6%

Why is Y400 better than Galaxy S25 FE?

Wired charging45 W vs 90 W2×
Battery capacity4,900 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+22%
Selfie camera12 MP vs 32 MP2.7×
Memory card slotNo · Galaxy S25 FE: Yes
Pixel density385 ppi vs 395 ppi+3%
Charged in 30 min65% vs 75%+15%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Samsung Galaxy S25 FE≈ $3808.9	Vivo Y400≈ $3808.4
Design
Weight	190 g	197 g
Thickness	7.4 mm	7.9 mm
Height	161.3 mm	162.3 mm
Width	76.6 mm	75.3 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Plastic
Back	Glass	Plastic
Ingress protection	IP68	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+	—
Colours	Icyblue, Jetblack, Navy, White	Glam White, Olive Green
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.7″
Panel	Dynamic AMOLED 2X	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,340 px	2,400 px
Pixel density	385 ppi	395 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	1,900 nits	1,800 nits
Measured brightness	1,247 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	89.2%	87.9%
HDR	Yes	—
Performance
Chipset	Exynos 2400	Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
Chip maker	Exynos	Qualcomm
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	10	8
CPU frequency	3.2 GHz	2.2 GHz
GPU	Xclipse 940	Adreno 613
AnTuTu score	1,521,140	—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	6,948	—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	4,262	—
Memory
RAM	8 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.0	UFS 3.1
Memory card slot	No	Yes
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/1.57"	1/2.96"
Rear cameras	3	1
Optical stabilisation	Yes	No
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	No
Telephoto camera	Yes	No
Optical zoom	3×	—
Max video	8K	1080p
4K video frame rate	120 fps	—
Selfie camera	12 MP	32 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	No
Battery
Battery capacity	4,900 mAh	6,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Ion	Li-Ion
Active use (test)	11.9 h	—
Wired charging	45 W	90 W
Charged in 30 min	65%	75%
Wireless charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging power	15 W	—
Reverse wireless charging	Yes	—
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6E	Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth	5.4	5
NFC	Yes	No
USB	USB Type-C 3.2	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	3.2	2
Video output	Yes	—
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-25.6 LUFS	—
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Barometer	Yes	—
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)	0.54 W/kg	0.99 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 16	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	One UI 9	Funtouch 15
Major OS updates promised	7	—
EU label
Energy class	B	—
Battery charge cycles	2,000	—
Endurance per cycle	43 h	—
Repairability class	C	—
Drop resistance class	A	—