android.gs
Compare
Galaxy S25 FE vs V50 Lite 5G

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE vs Vivo V50 Lite 5G

What Galaxy S25 FE does better (12) and where V50 Lite 5G wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Samsung · 2025Galaxy S25 FE

8.9Score

12 advantages≈ $380

Vivo · 2025V50 Lite 5G

8.9Score

5 advantages≈ $340

Higher score

8.1Display8.6

9.3Camera7.3

4.8Battery9.2

9.8Features8.5

Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy S25 FEV50 Lite 5G

	Galaxy S25 FE	V50 Lite 5G	Difference
Height	161.3 mm	163.8 mm	−2.5 mm
Width	76.6 mm	76.3 mm	+0.3 mm
Thickness	7.4 mm	7.8 mm	−0.4 mm
Weight	190 g	197 g	−7 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy S25 FE better than V50 Lite 5G?

Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
Optical stabilisationYes · V50 Lite 5G: No
Telephoto cameraYes · V50 Lite 5G: No
Wireless chargingYes · V50 Lite 5G: No
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx5+60%
CPU frequency3.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+33%
Peak brightness1,900 nits vs 1,800 nits+6%
Weight190 g vs 197 g+4%
Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
CPU cores10 vs 8+25%
Charged in 30 min65% vs 58%+12%
Thickness7.4 mm vs 7.8 mm+5%

Why is V50 Lite 5G better than Galaxy S25 FE?

Wired charging45 W vs 90 W2×
Battery capacity4,900 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+33%
Selfie camera12 MP vs 32 MP2.7×
Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
Screen-to-body ratio89.2% vs 94.2%+6%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Samsung Galaxy S25 FE≈ $3808.9	Vivo V50 Lite 5G≈ $3408.9
Design
Weight	190 g	197 g
Thickness	7.4 mm	7.8 mm
Height	161.3 mm	163.8 mm
Width	76.6 mm	76.3 mm
Frame	Aluminium	—
Back	Glass	—
Ingress protection	IP68	IP65
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx5
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+	—
Colours	Icyblue, Jetblack, Navy, White	Purple, Black, Gold
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.8″
Panel	Dynamic AMOLED 2X	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,340 px	2,392 px
Pixel density	385 ppi	387 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	1,900 nits	1,800 nits
Measured brightness	1,247 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	89.2%	94.2%
HDR	Yes	—
Performance
Chipset	Exynos 2400	Mediatek Dimensity 6300
Chip maker	Exynos	Mediatek
Process	4 nm	—
CPU cores	10	8
CPU frequency	3.2 GHz	2.4 GHz
GPU	Xclipse 940	Mali G57 MC2
AnTuTu score	1,521,140	—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	6,948	—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	4,262	—
Memory
RAM	8 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.0	—
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/1.57"	—
Rear cameras	3	2
Optical stabilisation	Yes	No
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	Yes	No
Optical zoom	3×	—
Max video	8K	—
4K video frame rate	120 fps	—
Selfie camera	12 MP	32 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	—
Battery
Battery capacity	4,900 mAh	6,500 mAh
Battery type	Li-Ion	Li-Ion
Active use (test)	11.9 h	—
Wired charging	45 W	90 W
Charged in 30 min	65%	58%
Wireless charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging power	15 W	—
Reverse wireless charging	Yes	—
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6E	—
Bluetooth	5.4	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 3.2	USB Type-C
USB version	3.2	—
Video output	Yes	—
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-25.6 LUFS	—
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Barometer	Yes	—
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer	proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, compass, fingerprint
SAR (head)	0.54 W/kg	—
Software
OS at launch	Android 16	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	One UI 9	FunTouch OS 15
Major OS updates promised	7	—
EU label
Energy class	B	B
Battery charge cycles	2,000	—
Endurance per cycle	43 h	—
Repairability class	C	—
Drop resistance class	A	—