android.gs
Compare
Galaxy S25 FE vs T4x

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE vs Vivo T4x

What Galaxy S25 FE does better (26) and where T4x wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Samsung · 2025Galaxy S25 FE

8.9Score

26 advantages≈ $380

Higher score

Vivo · 2025T4x

7.6Score

2 advantages≈ $410

8.1Display7.0

7.9Performance6.0

9.3Camera5.4

4.8Battery8.4

9.8Features5.8

Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy S25 FET4x

	Galaxy S25 FE	T4x	Difference
Height	161.3 mm	165.7 mm	−4.4 mm
Width	76.6 mm	76.3 mm	+0.3 mm
Thickness	7.4 mm	8.1 mm	−0.7 mm
Weight	190 g	204 g	−14 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy S25 FE better than T4x?

Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,948 vs 2,8422.4×
AnTuTu score1,521,140 vs 821,707+85%
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
OLED panelYes · T4x: No
Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
Optical stabilisationYes · T4x: No
Telephoto cameraYes · T4x: No
Wireless chargingYes · T4x: No
NFCYes · T4x: No
Peak brightness1,900 nits vs 1,050 nits+81%
Rear cameras3 vs 13×
4K video frame rate120 fps vs 30 fps4×

Why is T4x better than Galaxy S25 FE?

Battery capacity4,900 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+33%
Pixel density385 ppi vs 393 ppi+2%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Samsung Galaxy S25 FE≈ $3808.9	Vivo T4x≈ $4107.6
Design
Weight	190 g	204 g
Thickness	7.4 mm	8.1 mm
Height	161.3 mm	165.7 mm
Width	76.6 mm	76.3 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Plastic
Back	Glass	Plastic
Ingress protection	IP68	IP64
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx4
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+	—
Colours	Icyblue, Jetblack, Navy, White	Pronto Purple, Marine Blue
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.7″
Panel	Dynamic AMOLED 2X	IPS LCD
OLED panel	Yes	No
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,340 px	2,408 px
Pixel density	385 ppi	393 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	1,900 nits	1,050 nits
Measured brightness	1,247 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	89.2%	86%
HDR	Yes	—
Performance
Chipset	Exynos 2400	Mediatek Dimensity 7300
Chip maker	Exynos	MediaTek
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	10	8
CPU frequency	3.2 GHz	2.5 GHz
GPU	Xclipse 940	Mali-G615 MC2
AnTuTu score	1,521,140	821,707
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	6,948	2,842
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	4,262	—
Memory
RAM	8 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.0	UFS 3.1
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/1.57"	—
Rear cameras	3	1
Optical stabilisation	Yes	No
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	No
Telephoto camera	Yes	No
Optical zoom	3×	—
Max video	8K	4K
4K video frame rate	120 fps	30 fps
Selfie camera	12 MP	8 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	No
Battery
Battery capacity	4,900 mAh	6,500 mAh
Battery type	Li-Ion	Li-Ion
Active use (test)	11.9 h	—
Wired charging	45 W	44 W
Charged in 30 min	65%	38%
Wireless charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging power	15 W	—
Reverse wireless charging	Yes	—
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6E	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.4	5.4
NFC	Yes	No
USB	USB Type-C 3.2	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	3.2	2
Video output	Yes	—
Infrared port	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-25.6 LUFS	—
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Side
Barometer	Yes	—
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)	0.54 W/kg	—
Software
OS at launch	Android 16	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	One UI 9	Funtouch 15
Major OS updates promised	7	—
EU label
Energy class	B	—
Battery charge cycles	2,000	—
Endurance per cycle	43 h	—
Repairability class	C	—
Drop resistance class	A	—