android.gs
Compare
Galaxy S25 FE vs Camon 40 Pro 4G

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G

What Galaxy S25 FE does better (18) and where Camon 40 Pro 4G wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Samsung · 2025Galaxy S25 FE

8.9Score

18 advantages≈ $380

Higher score

Tecno · 2025Camon 40 Pro 4G

8.2Score

6 advantages

8.1Display8.6

7.9Performance4.6

9.3Camera9.1

4.8Battery7.9

9.8Features5.8

Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy S25 FECamon 40 Pro 4G

	Galaxy S25 FE	Camon 40 Pro 4G	Difference
Height	161.3 mm	164.4 mm	−3.1 mm
Width	76.6 mm	74.3 mm	+2.3 mm
Thickness	7.4 mm	7.3 mm	+0.1 mm
Weight	190 g	178 g	+12 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy S25 FE better than Camon 40 Pro 4G?

AnTuTu score1,521,140 vs 600,0622.5×
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,948 vs 1,9533.6×
Major OS updates promised7 vs 32.3×
Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
Telephoto cameraYes · Camon 40 Pro 4G: No
Wireless chargingYes · Camon 40 Pro 4G: No
5GYes · Camon 40 Pro 4G: No
CPU frequency3.2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+45%
Max video8K vs 4K
4K video frame rate120 fps vs 60 fps2×
4K selfie videoYes · Camon 40 Pro 4G: No
eSIMYes · Camon 40 Pro 4G: No

Why is Camon 40 Pro 4G better than Galaxy S25 FE?

Battery capacity4,900 mAh vs 5,200 mAh+6%
Selfie camera12 MP vs 50 MP4.2×
Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
Memory card slotNo · Galaxy S25 FE: Yes
Weight190 g vs 178 g+7%
Pixel density385 ppi vs 393 ppi+2%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Samsung Galaxy S25 FE≈ $3808.9	Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G8.2
Design
Weight	190 g	178 g
Thickness	7.4 mm	7.3 mm
Height	161.3 mm	164.4 mm
Width	76.6 mm	74.3 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Plastic
Back	Glass	—
Ingress protection	IP68	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+	Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
Colours	Icyblue, Jetblack, Navy, White	Emerald Lake Green, Galaxy Black, Glacier White
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.8″
Panel	Dynamic AMOLED 2X	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,340 px	2,436 px
Pixel density	385 ppi	393 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	1,900 nits	—
Measured brightness	1,247 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	89.2%	90%
HDR	Yes	—
Performance
Chipset	Exynos 2400	Mediatek Helio G100 Ultimate
Chip maker	Exynos	MediaTek
Process	4 nm	6 nm
CPU cores	10	8
CPU frequency	3.2 GHz	2.2 GHz
GPU	Xclipse 940	Mali-G57 MC2
AnTuTu score	1,521,140	600,062
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	6,948	1,953
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	4,262	—
Memory
RAM	8 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.0	UFS 2.2
Memory card slot	No	Yes
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.9
Main sensor size	1/1.57"	1/1.56"
Rear cameras	3	2
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	Yes	No
Optical zoom	3×	—
Max video	8K	4K
4K video frame rate	120 fps	60 fps
Selfie camera	12 MP	50 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	No
Battery
Battery capacity	4,900 mAh	5,200 mAh
Battery type	Li-Ion	Li-Po
Active use (test)	11.9 h	—
Wired charging	45 W	45 W
Charged in 30 min	65%	65%
Wireless charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging power	15 W	—
Reverse wireless charging	Yes	—
Connectivity
5G	Yes	No
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6E	Wi-Fi 4
Bluetooth	5.4	5.3
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 3.2	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	3.2	2
Video output	Yes	—
Infrared port	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-25.6 LUFS	—
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Barometer	Yes	—
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)	0.54 W/kg	—
Software
OS at launch	Android 16	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	One UI 9	HIOS 15
Major OS updates promised	7	3
EU label
Energy class	B	—
Battery charge cycles	2,000	—
Endurance per cycle	43 h	—
Repairability class	C	—
Drop resistance class	A	—