- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy Note 20 Ultra vs X70 Pro+
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra vs Vivo X70 Pro+
What Galaxy Note 20 Ultra does better (6) and where X70 Pro+ wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.3Display8.7
9.7Camera9.7
4.3Battery6.9
9.6Features8.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy Note 20 UltraX70 Pro+
| Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | X70 Pro+ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.8 mm | 164.5 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Width | 77.2 mm | 75.2 mm | +2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8.9 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Weight | 208 g | 209 g | −1 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy Note 20 Ultra better than X70 Pro+?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- Memory card slotYes · X70 Pro+: No
- 4K selfie videoYes · X70 Pro+: No
- eSIMYes · X70 Pro+: No
- Thickness8.1 mm vs 8.9 mm+10%
- USB version3.2 vs 3.1+3%
Why is X70 Pro+ better than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra?
- Wired charging25 W vs 55 W2.2×
- Selfie camera10 MP vs 32 MP3.2×
- Wireless charging power15 W vs 50 W3.3×
- CPU frequency2.73 GHz vs 3 GHz+10%
- Pixel density496 ppi vs 517 ppi+4%
- Rear cameras3 vs 4+33%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.6+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 208 g | 209 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 164.8 mm | 164.5 mm |
| Width | 77.2 mm | 75.2 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass Victus | — |
| Colours | — | Black, Blue, Orange |
| Stylus | Yes | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,440 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (height) | 3,088 px | 3,200 px |
| Pixel density | 496 ppi | 517 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,500 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,022 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.7% | 90.1% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 990 | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G |
| Chip maker | Samsung | Qualcomm |
| Process | — | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.73 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali G77 MP11 | Adreno 660 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 837,833 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,469 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | — | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | — | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.31" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 4 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 5× | 5× |
| Max video | 8K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 10 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 55 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | 50 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.1 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -24.8 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer, fingerprint | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | Funtouch OS 14 (International) |
