- android.gs
- Compare
- X50 Pro+ vs X70 Pro+
Vivo X50 Pro+ vs Vivo X70 Pro+
What X50 Pro+ does better (1) and where X70 Pro+ wins (15) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
X50 Pro+X70 Pro+
| X50 Pro+ | X70 Pro+ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 158.5 mm | 164.5 mm | −6 mm |
| Width | 73 mm | 75.2 mm | −2.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 8.9 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 192 g | 209 g | −17 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X50 Pro+ better than X70 Pro+?
- Weight192 g vs 209 g+9%
Why is X70 Pro+ better than X50 Pro+?
- AnTuTu score621,433 vs 837,833+35%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Wireless chargingNo · X50 Pro+: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · X50 Pro+: Yes
- Wired charging44 W vs 55 W+25%
- Battery capacity4,350 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+3%
- Pixel density398 ppi vs 517 ppi+30%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- CPU frequency2.84 GHz vs 3 GHz+6%
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+3%
- Process7 nm vs 5 nm+40%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,440 px+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 192 g | 209 g |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 158.5 mm | 164.5 mm |
| Width | 73 mm | 75.2 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Colours | Blue, Brown | Black, Blue, Orange |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,376 px | 3,200 px |
| Pixel density | 398 ppi | 517 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,500 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,022 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.4% | 90.1% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.84 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 660 |
| AnTuTu score | 621,433 | 837,833 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,411 | 3,469 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.31" | 1/1.31" |
| Rear cameras | 4 | 4 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 5× | 5× |
| Max video | 8K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,350 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Wired charging | 44 W | 55 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 62% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 50 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| USB version | — | 3.1 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -27.5 LUFS | -24.8 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Funtouch 10.5 | Funtouch OS 14 (International) |
