- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy M62 vs Xperia Pro-I
Samsung Galaxy M62 vs Sony Xperia Pro-I
What Galaxy M62 does better (7) and where Xperia Pro-I wins (20) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.2Display8.0
7.5Camera8.0
8.0Battery3.8
5.0Features8.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy M62Xperia Pro-I
| Galaxy M62 | Xperia Pro-I | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.9 mm | 166 mm | −2.1 mm |
| Width | 76.3 mm | 72 mm | +4.3 mm |
| Thickness | 9.5 mm | 8.9 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Weight | 218 g | 211 g | +7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy M62 better than Xperia Pro-I?
- Main camera64 MP vs 12 MP5.3×
- Battery capacity7,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+56%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 8 MP4×
- 4K selfie videoYes · Xperia Pro-I: No
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.5″+3%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/2+11%
- Screen-to-body ratio86.7% vs 82.5%+5%
Why is Xperia Pro-I better than Galaxy M62?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Galaxy M62: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · Galaxy M62: Yes
- 5GNo · Galaxy M62: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Galaxy M62: Yes
- Pixel density393 ppi vs 643 ppi+64%
- Wired charging25 W vs 30 W+20%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 512 GB4×
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 120 fps4×
- CPU frequency2.73 GHz vs 2.84 GHz+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 218 g | 211 g |
| Thickness | 9.5 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 163.9 mm | 166 mm |
| Width | 76.3 mm | 72 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx5 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Laser Green, Laser Gray, Laser Blue | Frosted Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,644 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 3,840 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 643 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 420 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | — | 644 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.7% | 82.5% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 9825 | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G |
| Chip maker | Exynos | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.73 GHz | 2.84 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP12 | Adreno 660 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 725,839 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,540 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3. |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 12 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/2 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.73" | 1" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 120 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,000 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 30 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 50% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| Video output | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -28.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.68 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 5 | — |
