- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy M62 vs Poco F3
Samsung Galaxy M62 vs Xiaomi Poco F3
What Galaxy M62 does better (6) and where Poco F3 wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.2Display7.9
7.5Camera6.7
8.0Battery4.2
5.0Features6.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy M62Poco F3
| Galaxy M62 | Poco F3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.9 mm | 163.7 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Width | 76.3 mm | 76.4 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 9.5 mm | 7.8 mm | +1.7 mm |
| Weight | 218 g | 196 g | +22 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy M62 better than Poco F3?
- Battery capacity7,000 mAh vs 4,520 mAh+55%
- Main camera64 MP vs 48 MP+33%
- Memory card slotYes · Poco F3: No
- 4K selfie videoYes · Poco F3: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Poco F3: No
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 20 MP+60%
Why is Poco F3 better than Galaxy M62?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- Peak brightness420 nits vs 1,300 nits3.1×
- 5GNo · Galaxy M62: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Galaxy M62: Yes
- Wired charging25 W vs 33 W+32%
- CPU frequency2.73 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+17%
- Weight218 g vs 196 g+11%
- Thickness9.5 mm vs 7.8 mm+22%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 218 g | 196 g |
| Thickness | 9.5 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 163.9 mm | 163.7 mm |
| Width | 76.3 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Laser Green, Laser Gray, Laser Blue | Arctic White, Night Black, Deep Ocean Blue, Moonlight Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 420 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 716 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.7% | 85.9% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 9825 | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G |
| Chip maker | Exynos | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.73 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP12 | Adreno 650 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 631,850 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,206 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,213 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.73" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,000 mAh | 4,520 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 58% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -24.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.68 W/kg | 0.6 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 5 | HyperOS |
