- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy M51 vs X50 Pro
Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Vivo X50 Pro
What Galaxy M51 does better (7) and where X50 Pro wins (17) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.0Display7.2
3.0Performance3.5
7.5Camera9.4
8.0Battery3.9
5.0Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy M51X50 Pro
| Galaxy M51 | X50 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.9 mm | 158.5 mm | +5.4 mm |
| Width | 76.3 mm | 72.8 mm | +3.5 mm |
| Thickness | 9.5 mm | 8 mm | +1.5 mm |
| Weight | 213 g | 182 g | +32 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy M51 better than X50 Pro?
- Battery capacity7,000 mAh vs 4,315 mAh+62%
- Main camera64 MP vs 48 MP+33%
- Measured brightness677 nits vs 503 nits+35%
- Memory card slotYes · X50 Pro: No
- 4K selfie videoYes · X50 Pro: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · X50 Pro: No
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.6″+2%
Why is X50 Pro better than Galaxy M51?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 90 Hz+50%
- AnTuTu score266,620 vs 323,736+21%
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Galaxy M51: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · Galaxy M51: Yes
- 5GNo · Galaxy M51: Yes
- Wired charging25 W vs 33 W+32%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,774 vs 1,937+9%
- Rear cameras2 vs 42×
- Weight213 g vs 182 g+17%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
- Charged in 30 min35% vs 57%+63%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 213 g | 182 g |
| Thickness | 9.5 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 163.9 mm | 158.5 mm |
| Width | 76.3 mm | 72.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3+ | — |
| Colours | Celestial Black, Electric Blue, White | Dark Blue, Light Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,376 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 398 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 650 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 677 nits | 503 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.7% | 90.6% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM730 Snapdragon 730G | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 620 |
| AnTuTu score | 266,620 | 323,736 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,774 | 1,937 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.73" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 4 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 5× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,000 mAh | 4,315 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 35% | 57% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.5 LUFS | -26.8 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.61 W/kg | 0.34 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 4.1 | Funtouch 10.5 |
