- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy M32 vs Galaxy M51
Samsung Galaxy M32 vs Samsung Galaxy M51
What Galaxy M32 does better (7) and where Galaxy M51 wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.9Display6.0
2.5Performance3.0
7.1Camera7.5
5.3Battery8.0
5.0Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy M32Galaxy M51
| Galaxy M32 | Galaxy M51 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159.3 mm | 163.9 mm | −4.6 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 76.3 mm | −2.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 9.5 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Weight | 180 g | 213 g | −33 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy M32 better than Galaxy M51?
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- AnTuTu score280,002 vs 266,620+5%
- Peak brightness800 nits vs 650 nits+23%
- Weight180 g vs 213 g+18%
- Measured brightness713 nits vs 677 nits+5%
- Pixel density411 ppi vs 393 ppi+5%
- Thickness8.4 mm vs 9.5 mm+13%
Why is Galaxy M51 better than Galaxy M32?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 7,000 mAh+40%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,205 vs 1,774+47%
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- 4K selfie videoNo · Galaxy M32: Yes
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+10%
- Screen size6.4″ vs 6.7″+5%
- Selfie camera20 MP vs 32 MP+60%
- Process12 nm vs 8 nm+50%
- Charged in 30 min30% vs 35%+17%
- Screen-to-body ratio83.9% vs 86.7%+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 180 g | 213 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 9.5 mm |
| Height | 159.3 mm | 163.9 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 76.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3+ |
| Colours | Black, Light Blue | Celestial Black, Electric Blue, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 411 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | 650 nits |
| Measured brightness | 713 nits | 677 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.9% | 86.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 | Qualcomm SDM730 Snapdragon 730G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 618 |
| AnTuTu score | 280,002 | 266,620 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,205 | 1,774 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 171 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.97" | 1/1.73" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 20 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 30% | 35% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -28.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.56 W/kg | 0.61 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 5 | One UI 4.1 |
