- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy M51 vs Armor 9
Samsung Galaxy M51 vs UleFone Armor 9
What Galaxy M51 does better (17) and where Armor 9 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.0Display4.1
3.0Performance2.7
7.5Camera5.4
8.0Battery7.5
5.0Features6.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy M51Armor 9
| Galaxy M51 | Armor 9 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.9 mm | 168.2 mm | −4.3 mm |
| Width | 76.3 mm | 82 mm | −5.7 mm |
| Thickness | 9.5 mm | 15 mm | −5.5 mm |
| Weight | 213 g | 320 g | −107 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy M51 better than Armor 9?
- AnTuTu score266,620 vs 197,000+35%
- OLED panelYes · Armor 9: No
- Wired charging25 W vs 18 W+39%
- Battery capacity7,000 mAh vs 6,600 mAh+6%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,774 vs 1,498+18%
- Weight213 g vs 320 g+50%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 8 MP4×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Armor 9: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- 4K selfie videoYes · Armor 9: No
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.3″+6%
Why is Armor 9 better than Galaxy M51?
- Pixel density393 ppi vs 409 ppi+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 213 g | 320 g |
| Thickness | 9.5 mm | 15 mm |
| Height | 163.9 mm | 168.2 mm |
| Width | 76.3 mm | 82 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Back | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3+ | Scratch-resistant glass, oleophobic coating |
| Colours | Celestial Black, Electric Blue, White | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.3″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 409 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 650 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 677 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.7% | 70.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM730 Snapdragon 730G | Mediatek MT6779 Helio P90 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | PowerVR GM9446 |
| AnTuTu score | 266,620 | 197,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,774 | 1,498 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.73" | 1/1.72" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,000 mAh | 6,600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 35% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.5 LUFS | -30.1 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, baroceptor, coulombmeter |
| SAR (head) | 0.61 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 4.1 | — |
